...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration
【24h】

Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration

机译:弯桥的数值和混合分析及数值模型的标定方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers are subjected to combined loading conditions resulting from complex earthquake ground motions coupled with irregular geometry and asymmetry of the bridge structure. fuerthermore, the influence of the assumptions and simplifications made in modeling irregular and curved bridges on the reliability of their resulting response data is still not fully known. For that purpose, in this paper a hybrid simulation test is conducted on a curved four-span bridge. This test accounts for the three-dimensional (3D) system-level interaction between the three experimental piers in two testing facilities with the numerical models of the deck, restraints and abutments. Prior to the hybrid simulation, a detailed numerical finite element, fiber-based model of the whole bridge system is established. The analytical predictions of this model are then used for comparison with the hybrid simulation test results. Discrepancies between the numerical and experimental results of the bridge piers response are highlighted and deficiencies in the numerical model assumptions are discussed. A rigorous numerical model calibration procedure is then followed to adjust for the initial modeling assumptions and improve the bridge model overall response. This study has proven that some modeling assumptions that are widely used in seismic analysis of bridge structures are unrealistic and therefore may lead to inaccurate results.
机译:钢筋混凝土(RC)桥墩承受的载荷条件是复杂的地震地震动以及不规则的几何形状和桥梁结构的不对称性造成的。此外,在对不规则和弯曲的桥梁进行建模时所做的假设和简化对其最终响应数据的可靠性的影响仍然未知。为此,本文在弯曲的四跨桥上进行了混合仿真测试。该测试考虑了两个测试设施中三个实验墩之间的三维(3D)系统级相互作用,其中包括甲板,约束和基台的数值模型。在进行混合仿真之前,建立了一个详细的数值有限元,基于纤维的整个桥梁系统模型。该模型的分析预测然后用于与混合仿真测试结果进行比较。突出了桥墩响应的数值和实验结果之间的差异,并讨论了数值模型假设中的不足。然后遵循严格的数值模型校准程序来调整初始模型假设并改善桥梁模型的整体响应。这项研究证明,在桥梁结构的地震分析中广泛使用的某些建模假设是不现实的,因此可能导致结果不准确。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Engineering Structures》 |2014年第1期|234-245|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Memphis, 3815 Central Avenue Room 106C, Memphis 38152, TN, USA;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 205 N Mathews Avenue, Urbana 61801, IL, USA;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 205 N Mathews Avenue, Urbana 61801, IL, USA;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 205 N Mathews Avenue, Urbana 61801, IL, USA;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 205 N Mathews Avenue, Urbana 61801, IL, USA;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ceorge Washington University, 801 22nd Street NW, DC 20052, USA;

    Earthquake Engineering Research & Test Center, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510405, China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Curved bridge; Hybrid simulation; Numerical model calibration; Combined actions; Multi-directional loading;

    机译:弯桥混合仿真数值模型校准;联合行动;多向加载;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号