首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Evaluation of the economic benefits of using Buckling-Restrained Braces in hospital structures located in very soft soils
【24h】

Evaluation of the economic benefits of using Buckling-Restrained Braces in hospital structures located in very soft soils

机译:评估在非常柔软的土壤中的医院结构中使用屈曲约束牙套的经济效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Since economic quantities are more meaningful to decision makers than dynamic response parameters, this paper examines the economic benefits of using Buckling-Restrained Braces (BRBs) in hospitals located in the very soft soils of the lakebed zone of Mexico City. Since non-structural elements and contents are far more expensive than the structure itself, they are included in detail in the analyses. The results of analyses on three-, six-, and nine-storey frames, which represent short-period structures, show that the expected (or probable) losses and lifecycle costs are smaller when structures are equipped with BRBs. Different cases (defined by the contribution of the BRBs to the strength capacity of the structure) were analysed and compared. The best design options were identified from a comparison of lifecycle costs. As an example, a comparison of cost-benefit analysis between a bare frame and a frame designed under gravity loads and equipped with BRBs, shows that the latter is more economical; because, for the same initial cost, the lifecycle costs are significantly smaller. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:由于经济量对决策者而言比动态响应参数更有意义,因此本文研究了在墨西哥城湖床区土壤很软的医院中使用屈曲固定支架(BRB)的经济效益。由于非结构元素和内容比结构本身要昂贵得多,因此在分析中会详细包含它们。对代表短期结构的三层,六层和九层框架的分析结果表明,当结构装有BRB时,预期的(或可能的)损失和生命周期成本较小。分析和比较了不同情况(由BRB对结构强度能力的贡献定义)。通过比较生命周期成本确定了最佳设计方案。例如,将裸露的框架与在重力载荷下设计并配备BRB的框架之间的成本效益分析进行比较,发现后者更为经济;因为对于相同的初始成本,生命周期成本要小得多。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号