首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Enhanced reliability assessment of punching shear resistance models for flat slabs without shear reinforcement
【24h】

Enhanced reliability assessment of punching shear resistance models for flat slabs without shear reinforcement

机译:没有剪切钢筋的平板冲压剪切电阻模型的增强可靠性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Punching shear is one of the main failure mechanisms in flat slabs. To prevent such failures, modern structural codes, as EN 1992-1-1, offer design provisions against punching shear. However, these provisions were calibrated based on experience, which can affect the precision of the resulting safety level. The use of modern reliability analysis techniques is required for a more precise evaluation of the safety level of these structural systems. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art of reliability techniques where the safety level of design provisions for punching shear resistance without shear reinforcement is investigated. This study addresses three reliability analysis techniques: Mean-Value First Order Second Moment Method (MVFOSM), First-Order Second Moment Method (FOSM) and a Monte-Carlo simulation with Importance Sampling (MC-IS). Reliability indices beta are used as a practical measurement of the safety level representing probabilities of failure. The parameters influencing the punching shear capacity without shear reinforcement were varied that the area of practical interest is covered. The estimated reliability indices beta are evaluated and compared to a target safety level given by EN 1990 for a 50-year reference period where beta is equal to 3.8. The results seem to confirm that the punching shear provisions for slabs without shear reinforcement according to EN 1992-1-1 achieve a required safety level, which is in accordance to the target level given by EN 1990. In addition, the study shows that the use of the techniques FOSM and MC-IS seems appropriate for determining the probability of failure of the design equation for the punching shear capacity without shear reinforcement. Furthermore, the study suggests that the method MVFOSM may not be suitable to assess the absolute safety level of such design equations. Finally, the study highlights the potential of using the aforementioned reliability analysis techniques and stresses the importance of modelling the uncertainties for a precise structural safety assessment of flat slabs without shear reinforcement.
机译:冲压剪切是平板中的主要故障机制之一。为防止此类故障,现代结构代码,即EN 1992-1-1,提供针对冲压剪切的设计规定。但是,这些规定基于经验校准,这可能会影响所产生的安全水平的精度。使用现代可靠性分析技术是对这些结构系统的安全水平进行更精确的评估所必需的。本文介绍了对最先进的可靠性技术的全面审查,其中还研究了在没有剪切钢筋的情况下进行冲压剪切电阻的设计规定的安全水平。本研究解决了三种可靠性分析技术:平均值第一阶第二矩法(MVFOSM),一阶第二矩法(FOSM)以及具有重要性采样的Monte-Carlo模拟(MC-IS)。可靠性指数Beta被用作表现出故障概率的安全水平的实际测量。影响没有剪切钢筋的冲压剪切容量的参数变化,即覆盖了实际兴趣的面积。评估估计的可靠性指数β并将其与EN 1990给出的目标安全水平进行比较,以获得50年的参考期,其中β等于3.8。结果似乎确认,根据EN 1992-1-1的没有剪切加强的板坯的冲压剪切规定达到了所需的安全水平,这是根据EN 1990给出的目标水平。此外,该研究表明了使用技术FOSM和MC-似乎适用于确定用于冲压剪切容量的设计方程的失效概率,而不会剪切加强。此外,该研究表明,该方法MVFOSM可能不适合评估这种设计方程的绝对安全水平。最后,该研究突出了使用上述可靠性分析技术的可能性,并强调了在没有剪切增强的情况下为平板的精确结构安全评估建模不确定性的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号