...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Experimental and numerical vibration analysis of plates with curvilinear sub-stiffeners
【24h】

Experimental and numerical vibration analysis of plates with curvilinear sub-stiffeners

机译:曲线副加劲肋板的实验和数值振动分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Curvilinear stiffened panels are being developed for aerospace structures and other applications. This paper presents an experimental and numerical study into the vibration response of three curvilinear stiffened square plates clamped at the edges. The experimental modal analysis was performed using laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) and an impact hammer test. Two of the three plates was constructed with curvilinear stiffener geometry, while the third was a straight stiffened plate with the stiffeners oriented at an angle to the edge of the plate. Even though the natural frequencies of the plates are similar, the different stiffening patterns was sufficient in providing unique directional properties and therefore distinct mode shapes. The numerical modal analysis of the plates was performed using finite element analysis (FEA). A comparison of the experimental and numerical results was carried out in terms of natural frequencies and mode shapes, using relative differences and modal assurance criterion (MAC), respectively. The experimental and numerical results were in good agreement for all the three plates. The difference between experimental and numerical natural frequencies was typically less than 5% and the diagonal MAC values typically ranged from 0.8 to 1. This is in line with previously published results in the literature. The reasons for differences between the experimental and numerical results, and the practical significance of the findings, are also discussed.
机译:正在开发用于航空航天结构和其他应用的曲线加筋板。本文对夹在边缘的三个曲线加劲方形板的振动响应进行了实验和数值研究。实验模态分析使用激光多普勒振动法(LDV)和冲击锤试验进行。三个板中的两个以曲线的加劲肋几何形状构造,而第三个是笔直的加劲板,且加劲肋与板的边缘成一定角度。即使板的固有频率相似,不同的加强图案也足以提供独特的方向性,从而提供不同的振型。板的数值模态分析是使用有限元分析(FEA)进行的。分别使用相对差和模态保证标准(MAC),按照固有频率和振型对实验结果和数值结果进行了比较。所有三个板的实验和数值结果均吻合良好。实验频率和数值固有频率之间的差异通常小于5%,对角MAC值的范围通常为0.8到1。这与文献中先前发表的结果一致。还讨论了实验结果和数值结果之间差异的原因,以及发现的实际意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号