...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Reliability-based design of FRP flexural strengthened reinforced concrete beams: Guidelines assessment and calibration
【24h】

Reliability-based design of FRP flexural strengthened reinforced concrete beams: Guidelines assessment and calibration

机译:FRP抗弯钢筋混凝土梁基于可靠性的设计:指南评估和校准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the past few decades, many guidelines and standards for FRP strengthened reinforced concrete (RC) structures have been presented based on the theory of reliability-based limit state with the load and resistance factor design (LRFD) approach. The LRFD method consists of two formats: the resistance reduction factor format and the material partial safety factor format. In this paper, several well-recognized design guidelines with these two formats for FRP flexural strengthened RC beams have been assessed based on model error and reliability index. First, the model error of each design guideline was evaluated based on a collected test database. Then, the reliability index was obtained by the importance sampling (IS) method, in which the optimum density function is determined by the first-order reliability method (FORM). Finally, the calibration of resistance reduction factor or FRP partial safety factor was performed with different target reliability indexes. The results show that: (1) The model error of each failure mode is different for each design guideline. For flexural failure, China's GB 50608 2010 has the lowest model error. For intermediate crack-induced (IC) debonding, UK's TR 55 2012 shows the highest model error. For end debonding, Italy's CNR-DT 200 R1/2012 is less conservative. (2) It is difficult to meet the pre-given reliability level for some failure modes in several design guidelines using the originally suggested design parameters. For example, GB 50608 2010, fib T5.1 2019 and JSCE 2001. (3) The calibrated resistance reduction factors or the FRP partial safety factors are provided to satisfy the target reliability level. However, it is meaningless and uneconomical to adopt partial safety factors that are too large or reduction factors that are too small to fit into a design. Other options can be chosen such as applying additional anchorages to avoid end debonding, increasing the FRP bonding area, and reducing the FRP thickness to avoid the probability of IC debonding failure.
机译:在过去的几十年中,基于基于可靠性的极限状态理论以及载荷和阻力系数设计(LRFD)方法,已经提出了许多FRP增强钢筋混凝土(RC)结构的准则和标准。 LRFD方法包括两种格式:电阻降低系数格式和材料局部安全系数格式。在本文中,已基于模型误差和可靠性指标评估了两种公认的FRP抗弯钢筋混凝土梁设计准则。首先,基于收集的测试数据库评估每个设计指南的模型误差。然后,通过重要性抽样(IS)方法获得可靠性指标,其中通过一阶可靠性方法(FORM)确定最佳密度函数。最后,用不同的目标可靠性指标对电阻降低因子或FRP部分安全因子进行了校准。结果表明:(1)每个设计准则的每种失效模式的模型误差均不同。对于弯曲破坏,中国的GB 50608 2010具有最低的模型误差。对于中间裂纹诱导(IC)脱胶,英国的TR 55 2012显示出最高的模型误差。对于端部剥离,意大利的CNR-DT 200 R1 / 2012不那么保守。 (2)使用最初建议的设计参数,在几个设计指南中很难满足某些故障模式的预先给定的可靠性水平。例如,GB 50608 2010,fib T5.1 2019和JSCE2001。(3)提供了经过校准的电阻降低系数或FRP部分安全系数,以满足目标可靠性水平。但是,采用太大的局部安全系数或太大而无法适合设计的折减系数是没有意义且不经济的。可以选择其他选项,例如施加额外的锚固以避免端部剥离,增加FRP接合面积以及减小FRP厚度以避免IC剥离失败的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号