...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Project Organization Journal >Understanding power within project work: the neglected role of material and embodied registers
【24h】

Understanding power within project work: the neglected role of material and embodied registers

机译:了解项目工作中的力量:物质和具体登记册的被忽视的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we seek to contribute to debates into new modalities of power within project-based organizations (PBOs), and specifically architectural practices. Using a targeted ethnography, we explore specific episodes within the workflow of an architectural practice. Here, we explore how imperatives for creativity and collaboration are reconciled alongside those for control and authority through specific relations of power. In contrast with other critical accounts of power in PBOs, we explicitly examine the influence of embodied and material registers of practice. This approach draws inspiration from studies across the social sciences, not least those of architectural practice, which have revealed how embodied and material practices shape organizational life. Our research reveals that despite an overt attempt to play down hierarchical modes of organization, management control and authority is still apparent, albeit it in a form that is highly embodied and intertwined with material relations. Thus, power is not manifest in social relations per se, but plays out across embodied and material registers, from the layout and use of office space to the actions and emotions of individuals within a meeting. The research importantly reveals that power in architectural practices, and other PBOs, is likely multiple: ‘hierarchy’ enables decisions to be made, responsibility to be apportioned and disputes to be settled, while ‘heterarchy’ encourages creativity, co-learning, motivation and communication. Thus, the paper argues that if we can understand power in PBO in more nuanced and positive terms, then we can better understand how work is done and through what techniques. This could lead to deeper theoretical insights into project-based forms of organizing, not least architectural practice.View full textDownload full textKeywordsArchitecture, ethnography, heterarchy, hierarchy, powerRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.648619
机译:在本文中,我们力求为基于项目的组织(PBO)内部权力的新模式辩论,尤其是架构实践,做出贡献。使用针对性的人种志,我们探索了建筑实践工作流程中的特定情节。在这里,我们探索如何通过特定的权力关系将创造力和协作的紧迫性与控制权和权威性的紧迫感进行协调。与PBO中其他重要的权力解释相反,我们明确地研究了实践的具体和实质性记录的影响。这种方法从整个社会科学的研究中汲取了灵感,尤其是建筑实践的研究,这些研究揭示了具体实践和物质实践如何影响组织生活。我们的研究表明,尽管公开尝试淡化组织的分层模式,但管理控制和权限仍然很明显,尽管这种形式高度体现并与物质关系交织在一起。因此,权力本身并没有体现在社会关系中,而是在具体的和实质的登记簿中发挥作用,从办公室空间的布局和使用到会议中个人的行为和情感。该研究重要地表明,架构实践和其他PBO中的权力可能是多种多样的:“层次结构”使决策得以制定,责任分配和争议得以解决,而“层次结构”则鼓励创造力,共同学习,动机和沟通。因此,本文认为,如果我们能够以更加细微和积极的术语来理解PBO中的权力,那么我们就可以更好地了解工作是如何完成的以及通过什么技术。这可能会导致对基于项目的组织形式(尤其是建筑实践)进行更深入的理论研究。查看全文下载全文关键字体系结构,人种学,层次结构,层次结构,权力相关的变量add add_id ,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.648619

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号