首页> 外文期刊>The engineering economist >STOCHASTIC OIL PRICE MODELS: COMPARISON AND IMPACT
【24h】

STOCHASTIC OIL PRICE MODELS: COMPARISON AND IMPACT

机译:随机油价模型:比较和影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A good investment decision-making process is one that is able to assess risk and uncertainty and manage them in a balanced manner. Literature on current oil and gas industry practice indicates that the modeling of uncertainty is largely restricted to reserves while production, cost, and oil price data are all single point deterministic values indicating certainty. The objective of this article is to explore the impact of three stochastic oil price models: geometric Brownian motion (GEM), mean reversion (MR) and mean reversion with jumps, on the uncertainty output of a project's net present value (NPV). Furthermore, it investigates the impact of varying the input parameters of the three stochastic oil price models. This article concludes that range in the project NPV values using the MR with jumps model is far greater than the MR and GBM models. In addition, if the decision is based on the mean value, then the GBM model is a good approximation if the current oil price is close to the long-term price. However, if the decision is based on the standard deviation, GBM does not provide a good approximation. Finally, uncertainty in the volatility of oil price has a significant impact only in the GBM model, but not on the MR or the MR with jumps models.
机译:良好的投资决策过程是一种能够评估风险和不确定性并以平衡方式进行管理的过程。有关当前石油和天然气行业实践的文献表明,不确定性的建模主要限于储量,而生产,成本和石油价格数据都是单点确定性值,表明确定性。本文的目的是探讨三种随机油价模型:几何布朗运动(GEM),均值回归(MR)和均值跳跃跃迁对项目净现值(NPV)不确定性输出的影响。此外,它研究了改变三种随机油价模型的输入参数的影响。本文得出的结论是,使用带跳跃的MR模型的项目NPV值范围远大于MR和GBM模型。另外,如果决策基于平均值,那么如果当前油价接近长期价格,GBM模型将是一个很好的近似值。但是,如果决策基于标准偏差,则GBM无法提供良好的近似值。最后,油价波动性的不确定性仅对GBM模型具有重大影响,而对MR或具有跳跃模型的MR则没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号