首页> 外文期刊>Engineering analysis with boundary elements >Comparison of local weak and strong form meshless methods for 2-D diffusion equation
【24h】

Comparison of local weak and strong form meshless methods for 2-D diffusion equation

机译:二维扩散方程的局部弱形式和强形式无网格方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A comparison between weak form meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (MLPG) and strong form meshless diffuse approximate method (DAM) is performed for the diffusion equation in two dimen sions. The shape functions are in both methods obtained by moving least squares (MLS) approximation with the polynomial weight function of the fourth order on the local support domain with 13 closest nodes. The weak form test functions are similar to the MLS weight functions but defined over the square quadrature domain. Implicit timestepping is used. The methods are tested in terms of average and maximum error norms on uniform and non-uniform node arrangements on a square without and with a hole for a Dirichlet jump problem and involvement of Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. The results are compared also to the results of the finite difference and finite element method. It has been found that both meshless methods provide a similar accuracy and the same convergence rate. The advantage of DAM is in simpler numerical implementation and lower computational cost.
机译:针对二维扩散方程,对弱形式无网格局部Petrov-Galerkin方法(MLPG)和强形式无网格扩散近似方法(DAM)进行了比较。在这两种方法中,形状函数都是通过在具有13个最近节点的局部支持域上通过移动最小二乘(MLS)近似与四阶多项式加权函数获得的。弱形式测试函数类似于MLS权重函数,但在平方正交域上定义。使用隐式时间步长。在没有孔和有孔的正方形的均匀和不均匀节点排列上,针对Dirichlet跳问题和Dirichlet和Neumann边界条件的参与,对平均和最大误差范数进行了测试。还将结果与有限差分法和有限元法的结果进行比较。已经发现,两种无网格方法都提供相似的精度和相同的收敛速度。 DAM的优势在于更简单的数值实现和较低的计算成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号