首页> 外文期刊>Engineering analysis with boundary elements >Modeling elastic wave propagation in fluid-filled boreholes drilled in nonhomogeneous media: BEM-MLPG versus BEM-FEM coupling
【24h】

Modeling elastic wave propagation in fluid-filled boreholes drilled in nonhomogeneous media: BEM-MLPG versus BEM-FEM coupling

机译:模拟在非均质介质中钻探的充满流体的钻孔中的弹性波传播:BEM-MLPG与BEM-FEM耦合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The efficiency of two coupling formulations, the boundary element method (BEM)-meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) versus the BEM-finite element method (FEM), used to simulate the elastic wave propagation in fluid-filled boreholes generated by a blast load, is compared. The longitudinal geometry is assumed to be invariant in the axial direction (2.5D formulation). The material properties in the vicinity of the borehole are assumed to be nonhomogeneous as a result of the construction process and the ageing of the material. In both models, the BEM is used to tackle the propagation within the fluid domain inside the borehole and the unbounded homogeneous domain. The MLPG and the FEM are used to simulate the confined, damaged, nonhomogeneous, surrounding borehole, thus utilizing the advantages of these methods in modeling nonhomogeneous bounded media. In both numerical techniques the coupling is accomplished directly at the nodal points located at the common interfaces. Continuity of stresses and displacements is imposed at the solid-solid interface, while continuity of normal stresses and displacements and null shear stress are prescribed at the fluid-solid interface. The performance of each coupled BEM-MLPG and BEM-FEM approach is determined using referenced results provided by an analytical solution developed for a circular multi-layered subdomain. The comparison of the coupled techniques is evaluated for different excitation frequencies, axial wavenumbers and degrees of freedom (nodal points).
机译:边界耦合方法(BEM)-无网格局部Petrov-Galerkin(MLPG)与BEM有限元方法(FEM)两种耦合公式的效率,用于模拟爆炸产生的充液钻孔中的弹性波传播。负载,进行比较。假定纵向几何形状在轴向方向不变(2.5D公式)。由于构造过程和材料的老化,假定在钻孔附近的材料特性是不均匀的。在两个模型中,BEM都用于解决井眼内流体域和无界均匀域内的传播。 MLPG和FEM用于模拟受限,受损,非均质的井眼,从而利用这些方法的优势来模拟非均质的有界介质。在两种数值技术中,耦合都是直接在位于公共界面的节点处完成的。应力和位移的连续性被施加在固-固界面上,而法向应力和位移的连续性和零剪切应力被规定在流固界面上。使用为圆形多层子域开发的分析解决方案提供的参考结果,可以确定每种耦合的BEM-MLPG和BEM-FEM方法的性能。针对不同的激励频率,轴向波数和自由度(节点)评估了耦合技术的比较。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    ITeCons - Institute for Research and Technological Development in Construction, Energy, Environment and Sustainability, Rua Pedro Hispano, Coimbra, Portugal,ADAI - LAETA, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, Pólo II, Rua Luís Reis Santos, Coimbra, Portugal;

    Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Sevilla, Camino de los Descubrimientos, Sevilla, Spain;

    Institute of Construction and Architecture, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia;

    Institute of Construction and Architecture, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia;

    Institute of Construction and Architecture, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia;

    Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Sevilla, Camino de los Descubrimientos, Sevilla, Spain;

    ADAI - LAETA, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, Pólo II, Rua Luís Reis Santos, Coimbra, Portugal;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Coupling techniques; Damaged zone; Fluid-solid interaction; Wave propagation;

    机译:耦合技术;损坏的区域;流固耦合;波传播;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号