首页> 外文期刊>Energy Engineering >Strategic Industrial Energy Efficiency: Reduce Expenses, Build Revenues, and Control Risk
【24h】

Strategic Industrial Energy Efficiency: Reduce Expenses, Build Revenues, and Control Risk

机译:战略性工业能源效率:降低费用,增加收入并控制风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Some manufacturing companies successfully boost their financial performance through optimized energy use. This leads not only to reduced energy consumption and associated environmental benefits, but also to capacity improvements that generate additional revenue. Other manufacturers dismiss energy efficiency as a distraction from the central mission of producing and selling their products. Their disregard for energy efficiency results in the widespread forfeiture of opportunities to effectively compete in the global marketplace. Efficiency advocates celebrate examples of successful industrial energy management in an attempt to encourage others to follow. That promotion has not always been effective. Advocates have historically promoted energy efficiency as its own good outcome. That message does not resonate with business leaders whose success is predicated on sales volume and revenue growth. Full adoption of energy efficiency will be resisted as long as this message gap endures. To the extent that managers are unaware of the full range of energy-efficiency benefits, their budgeting process is skewed. Capital funding is almost always limited, and management biases tend to favor core processes over ancillary functions, including energy. Even if facility staffs are fully aware of energy improvement opportunities, they may lack sufficient time and appropriate labor to implement and maintain efficiency measures. Given incomplete knowledge of the benefits of energy efficiency, the easiest decision with respect to implementation is to "do nothing." Efficiency advocates will make greater progress if they offer the industrial sector meaningful solutions to its current business needs. Any outreach to industry should provide a business philosophy that clearly states a desired outcome for industry's corporate leaders, such as improved bottom-line performance, enhanced productivity, or relief from business risks such as power supply discontinuities. Energy efficiency is then articulated as a contributor to those needs. A well-crafted business philosophy should inspire corporate interest and shape the ensuing dialog with energy stakeholders. For industry, energy efficiency is not the goal, but the means by which larger goals are attained.
机译:一些制造公司通过优化能源使用成功提高了财务业绩。这不仅可以减少能源消耗和相关的环境效益,还可以提高容量并增加收入。其他制造商则视能效为对生产和销售其产品的核心使命的干扰。他们无视能源效率,导致丧失了有效竞争全球市场的机会。倡导效率的人赞扬成功进行工业能源管理的例子,以鼓励其他人效仿。这种提升并不总是有效的。倡导者在历史上一直以提高能源效率为己任。该消息不会引起商业领袖的共鸣,他们的成功取决于销量和收入增长。只要这种信息鸿沟持续存在,就将抵制完全采用能源效率。如果经理们不了解所有的节能效益,那么他们的预算编制流程就会出现偏差。资本资金几乎总是有限的,而且管理偏向倾向于偏重于核心流程而非辅助功能,包括能源。即使设施工作人员充分意识到改善能源的机会,他们也可能缺乏足够的时间和适当的劳动力来实施和维护效率措施。如果不完全了解能源效率的好处,那么就实施而言,最简单的决定就是“什么都不做”。效率倡导者如果为工业部门提供满足其当前业务需求的有意义的解决方案,将会取得更大的进步。任何与行业的联系都应提供一种明确说明行业企业领导者期望成果的经营理念,例如改善底线绩效,提高生产率或减轻业务风险(例如电源中断)。然后阐明了能效,为这些需求做出了贡献。精心设计的经营理念应激发公司的兴趣,并与能源利益相关者建立随后的对话。对于工业而言,能源效率不是目标,而是实现更大目标的手段。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Engineering》 |2005年第3期|p.7-27|共21页
  • 作者

    Christopher Russell;

  • 作者单位

    Alliance to Save Energy, Washington, DC;

  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 房屋建筑设备;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:28:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号