首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Lifecycle economic analysis of biofuels: Accounting for economic substitution in policy assessment
【24h】

Lifecycle economic analysis of biofuels: Accounting for economic substitution in policy assessment

机译:生物燃料的生命周期经济分析:在政策评估中考虑经济替代

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper develops a lifecycle economic analysis (LCEA) model that integrates endogenous input substitution into the standard lifecycle analysis (LCA) of biofuel that typically assumes fixed-proportions production. We use the LCEA model to examine impacts of a pure carbon tax and a revenue-neutral tax-subsidy policy on lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from cellulosic ethanol using forest residues as feedstock in Washington State. In a model allowing for input substitution in the cellulosic ethanol feedstock, conversion, and transportation process, we consider energy source substitution (woody biomass for coal in the cellulosic ethanol conversion plant and biodiesel for diesel in feedstock production and feedstock and ethanol transportation) as well as substitution of capital and labor for energy in all stages of the lifecycle. We find that ignoring endogenous input substitution by using standard LCA leads to substantial underestimation of the impact of carbon tax policies on carbon emissions. Both tax policies can substantially reduce carbon emissions by inducing substitution among inputs. The revenue-neutral tax-subsidy policy reduces emissions more effectively than the carbon tax policy for carbon tax rates currently in place throughout most of the world. It stimulates substitution of woody biomass for coal and biodiesel for diesel at much lower tax rates when accompanied by corresponding subsidies for reduced emissions from renewable sources. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文开发了一个生命周期经济分析(LCEA)模型,该模型将内源性输入替代值集成到通常假定固定比例生产的生物燃料标准生命周期分析(LCA)中。我们使用LCEA模型检查纯碳税和税收中性税收补贴政策对华盛顿州使用森林残余物为原料的纤维素乙醇生命周期温室气体排放的影响。在一个允许在纤维素乙醇原料,转化和运输过程中进行输入替代的模型中,我们还考虑了能源替代(纤维素乙醇转化工厂中煤炭的木质生物质以及原料生产以及原料和乙醇运输中柴油的生物柴油)在生命周期的所有阶段都用资本和劳动力替代能源。我们发现,使用标准LCA忽略内生投入替代会导致对碳税政策对碳排放量的影响的严重低估。两种税收政策都可以通过在投入中进行替代来大幅减少碳排放。与收入中立的税收补贴政策相比,在世界上大多数国家/地区,目前针对碳税率的碳税政策更有效地减少了排放。它伴随着相应的补贴以减少可再生资源的排放,从而以低得多的税率刺激了木质生物质替代煤炭和生物柴油替代柴油。 (C)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号