...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >How good are analyst forecasts of oil prices?
【24h】

How good are analyst forecasts of oil prices?

机译:分析师对油价预测有多好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Even though there is a wide consensus that having good oil price forecasts is very valuable for many agents in the economy, results have not been fully satisfactory and there is an ongoing effort to improve their accuracy. Research has explored many different modeling approaches including time series, regressions, and artificial intelligence, among others. Also, many different sources of input data have been used like spot and futures prices, product spreads, and micro and macro variables.This paper explores how useful analyst expected price data are for forecasting when appropriate measures are taken to account for their sparse nature and high volatility. It proposes a multifactor stochastic pricing model, with time-varying risk premiums calibrated with filtered futures and analyst forecasts using a Kalman Filter.The forecasting model is applied to ten years of oil prices and analyst forecasts, from NYMEX and Bloomberg, respectively. Results are very encouraging showing that the model forecasts are much better than the no-change forecasts, commonly used as a benchmark, and better than those from the widely used Bloomberg's Consensus Expected Price Model. We conclude that analyst forecasts are a valuable source of input data that should be considered in future forecasting models.
机译:尽管在经济中许多代理商具有良好的油价预测,但具有良好的石油价格预测,但结果并未完全令人满意,并且正在持续努力提高其准确性。研究探讨了许多不同的建模方法,包括时间序列,回归和人工智能等。此外,许多不同的输入数据来源已经用作现货和期货价格,产品展示和微型和宏变量。这篇论文探讨了有用的分析师预期价格数据是如何预测适当措施,以考虑其稀疏性质和高挥发性。它提出了一种多因素随机定价模型,使用卡尔曼滤波器的过滤期货和分析师预测校准时变风险溢价。预测模型分别从纽约州纽约州纽约州和彭博等十年的油价和分析师预测。结果非常令人鼓舞,表明,模型预测比无变化预测要好得多,通常用作基准,而且比广泛使用的彭博共识的预期价格模型更好。我们得出结论,分析师预测是应在未来的预测模型中考虑的有价值的输入数据来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号