首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Prices vs. percentages: Use of tradable green certificates as an instrument of greenhouse gas mitigation
【24h】

Prices vs. percentages: Use of tradable green certificates as an instrument of greenhouse gas mitigation

机译:价格与百分比:使用可交易绿色证书作为温室天然气缓解仪器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We consider a regulator who seeks to achieve a specific target path of greenhouse gas emission reductions in the electricity sector. Generation stems from two sources: renewable (green) and fossil (black) sources, which cause emissions. We construct a dynamic model and explore the suitability of a tradable green certificate (TGC) scheme for solving this problem. Further, we study the resulting incentives for construction of new green generation ca-pacity. We provide a novel contribution to the TGC literature by using a dynamic model that allows analyses of time-related issues that are inaccessible with static models. Further, we focus explicitly on calibration of the time path of percentage requirements. We devise two specific time paths and show that the use of a TGC scheme can achieve a specific dynamic emission target but always results in overinvestment in new green generation ca-pacity. We also derive results from using an emission fee and a green subsidy, compare the different instruments, and conduct a welfare ranking. A TGC scheme is not as cost-effective as an optimal emission fee but is more effective than a green subsidy. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们考虑一个监管机构,旨在实现电力部门温室气体排放减少的特定目标路径。从两个来源的产生:可再生(绿色)和化石(黑色)来源,导致排放。我们构建一个动态模型,并探索可交易绿色证书(TGC)方案来解决此问题的适用性。此外,我们研究产生新的绿色一代Ca-pacity的促进奖励。我们通过使用动态模型为TGC文献提供了一种新颖的贡献,允许分析与静态模型无法访问的时间相关的问题。此外,我们明确地关注百分比要求的时间路径的校准。我们设计了两个特定的时间路径,并表明使用TGC方案可以实现特定的动态发射目标,但总是导致新的绿色产生CA-肤色的过度投资。我们还从使用排放费和绿色补贴,比较不同的乐器,并进行福利排名。 TGC方案与最佳排放费不那么成本效益,但比绿色补贴更有效。 (c)2021 elestvier b.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号