首页> 外文期刊>Empirical Software Engineering >Are Reviews an Alternative to Pair Programming?
【24h】

Are Reviews an Alternative to Pair Programming?

机译:评论是配对编程的替代方法吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

From the first presentation of extreme programming on, pair programming has attracted a wide range of programmers to work together in front of one display. The proposed advantages of pair programming are a faster development cycle and code with higher quality. However, the nearly doubled personnel cost when compared to single developers seems to outweigh these advantages. Instead of showing the superiority of pair programming, we seek an alternative. Can a single developer be assisted by an already known technique with which he produces the quality of pairs with only a fraction of the cost? The answer with some restrictions is: yes, he can. Reviews are a reasonable candidate with respect to code quality and cost.
机译:从首次展示极限编程开始,结对编程吸引了众多程序员在一个显示器前共同工作。对编程的建议优点是开发周期更快,代码质量更高。但是,与单个开发人员相比,人员成本几乎翻了一番,似乎超过了这些优势。我们没有显示结对编程的优势,而是寻求替代方法。单个开发人员是否可以借助已知的技术协助他以仅一小部分的成本生产成对的质量?有一些限制的答案是:是的,他可以。对于代码质量和成本,评审是合理的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号