首页> 外文期刊>The Electronic Library >Determining evaluation criteria for digital libraries' user interface: a review
【24h】

Determining evaluation criteria for digital libraries' user interface: a review

机译:确定数字图书馆用户界面的评估标准:回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The present study aims to review the literature concerning Digital Libraries (DLs) and user interfaces in order to identify, determine, and suggest evaluation criteria for a DLs user interface. Accordingly, this study's objectives are threefold: explore which criteria exert a significant relationship with the DLs user interface; identify a set of criteria that appears to be useful for evaluating DLs user interface; and determine evaluation criteria that have more frequency and occurrence in the related texts reviewed.Design/methodology/approach - To do it, first, identifying related texts was necessary. Consequently, keywords such as "DLs user interface evaluation"," DLs user interfaces", "DLs evaluation", "DLs usability", "user interface evaluation", "DLs research", "web sites user interface evaluation", "user interface standards", and the like have been searched in the web as well as in some leading databases including Emerald, Proquest, SagePub, ScienceDirect, LISA, ERIC, ACM, and Springer. After identifying and accessing more than 100 evaluative works and some related articles, theoretical and empirical, nearly 50 sources were chosen for final examination. Findings - After reviewing related texts, three major categories are identified: user interface and DLs; DLs and usability; and other studies related to user interface; each one of three identified categories has its own subcategories. Additionally, 22 evaluation criteria for assessing DLs interface have been identified.Research limitations/implications - The review does not claim to be comprehensive. Practical implications - Hopefully, criteria such as feedback, ease of use, match between system and the real world, customization, user support, user workload, interaction, compatibility, visibility of system status, user experience, flexibility, and accessibility which have been less considered should be applied more in future, particularly user-oriented, studies. Furthermore, it is expected that criteria mentioned here could help related bodies pay more attention to the evaluation of EISs, especially DLs interface.Originality/value - It can be said that this study has contributed to the research into the evaluation of DL interface.
机译:目的-本研究旨在回顾有关数字图书馆(DL)和用户界面的文献,以便识别,确定和建议DLs用户界面的评估标准。因此,这项研究的目标是三方面的:探讨哪些标准与DL的用户界面有重要关系;确定一组似乎对评估DL用户界面有用的标准;设计/方法/方法-要做到这一点,首先,需要确定相关文本。因此,诸如“ DLs用户界面评估”,“ DLs用户界面”,“ DLs评估”,“ DLs可用性”,“用户界面评估”,“ DLs研究”,“网站用户界面评估”,“用户界面”之类的关键字标准”之类的东西已经在网上以及一些主要数据库中进行了搜索,包括Emerald,Proquest,SagePub,ScienceDirect,LISA,ERIC,ACM和Springer。在识别并访问了100多个评估作品和一些相关文章(理论和经验)之后,选择了将近50个来源进行最终检查。调查结果-在查看相关文本后,确定了三个主要类别:用户界面和DL; DL和可用性;和其他与用户界面有关的研究;所标识的三个类别中的每个类别都有其自己的子类别。此外,已经确定了22条用于评估DL界面的评估标准。研究局限/含意-该审查并不声称是全面的。实际意义-希望诸如反馈,易用性,系统与现实世界之间的匹配,自定义,用户支持,用户工作量,交互作用,兼容性,系统状态的可见性,用户体验,灵活性和可访问性等标准较少被认为应该在将来更多地应用,特别是面向用户的研究。此外,期望这里提到的标准可以帮助相关机构更加重视EIS的评估,尤其是DLs接口的评估。原创性/价值-可以说,这项研究为DL接口评估的研究做出了贡献。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Electronic Library》 |2011年第5期|p.698-722|共25页
  • 作者

    Nadjla Hariri; Yaghoub Norouzi;

  • 作者单位

    Science and Research Branch, Department of Library and Information Science,Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran;

    Science and Research Branch, Department of Library and Information Science,Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    digital libraries; evaluation criteria; user interfaces;

    机译:数字图书馆;评估标准;用户界面;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:21:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号