首页> 外文期刊>Electrical Engineering >Discussion of article on comparative studies of new push-pull methods for pole-top resuscitation
【24h】

Discussion of article on comparative studies of new push-pull methods for pole-top resuscitation

机译:讨论有关极顶复苏新推挽方法的比较研究的文章

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN RAISED, mostly by safety engineers of electric power supply companies, as to whether the basic principle of the recently accepted Holger-Nielsen push-pull prone method of artificial respiration is applicable as an advantageous revision of the pole-top method of artificial respiration. As a result of the authors' interest in the general problem of artificial respiration, there now is available for study and analysis, data based on well-planned and courageously executed laboratory tests. However, when a change from the time-proved practice is contemplated, serious consideration must be given to two factors of primary importance, namely, whether the present practice is inadequate, either from an application or efficiency viewpoint, or whether the present practice can be replaced by another which is more effective without greatly sacrificing any advantages of the one being replaced.
机译:有关问题,主要是由供电公司的安全工程师提出的,关于最近接受的Holger-Nielsen推挽俯卧人工呼吸法的基本原理是否可作为人工顶极方法的有利修订版呼吸。由于作者对人工呼吸的一般性问题感兴趣,因此现在可以进行研究和分析,以及基于精心计划并勇于执行的实验室测试的数据。但是,当考虑从时间证明的实践中进行更改时,必须认真考虑两个最重要的因素,即从应用程序或效率的角度来看,当前实践是否不足,或者是否可以采用当前实践。替换为另一种更有效的方法,而又不会大大牺牲被替换方法的任何优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号