【24h】

What's Reasonable?

机译:什么是合理的?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two months ago, I talked about a typical old-work repair that was added to the partial renovation of a kitchen last updated in the early 1960s. Very confused wiring, far from up-to-date, had stopped working, and I chose to refeed it completely from a different direction. I could have double-fed it. There are real advantages to that exotic but still-employed approach to an ordinary branch circuit, but its legality is questionable. Carter system switching, which allows an outlet to be controlled using one wire coming from each switch, also is very old and definitely has been illegal since early in the 20th century.
机译:两个月前,我谈到了一次典型的旧工作修理,这是对厨房的部分翻新工程的补充,该厨房于1960年代初进行了更新。非常混乱的接线(不是最新的)已经停止工作,我选择完全从另一个方向重新供电。我本来可以吃饱的。对于普通分支电路来说,这种奇特但仍在使用的方法具有真正的优势,但其合法性值得怀疑。卡特系统切换允许使用一根来自每个开关的电线控制插座,这也很老,并且从20世纪初开始就肯定是非法的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号