首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >ECONOMIC REDUCTIONISM, FORMULAIC RESPONSES, AND PUSHING ALLIES AWAY? A RESPONSE TO SOME COMMENTS ON MARXISM AND EDUCATIONAL THEORY: ORIGINS AND ISSUES
【24h】

ECONOMIC REDUCTIONISM, FORMULAIC RESPONSES, AND PUSHING ALLIES AWAY? A RESPONSE TO SOME COMMENTS ON MARXISM AND EDUCATIONAL THEORY: ORIGINS AND ISSUES

机译:经济减少主义,形式上的回应和推销盟友?对马克思主义和教育理论的一些评论的回应:起源和问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Kevin Murray and Daniel P. Liston are of the opinion that my book, Marxism and Educational Theory: Origins and Issues, "offers both a helpful primer on Marxist educational theory as well as sophisticated analyses of twentieth-century 'advances' on Marxist educational framings." Michael Apple, on the other hand, states: Even though [Marxism and Educational Theory] argues at one or two junctures against an economically deterministic version of Marxism, [its] proposed alternative is still largely a restored economistic Marxism. In a number of ways, the book reads like something of a primer on this limited version of Marxism. Apple believes that, because of its "economic reductionism" and "formulaic responses that obliterate complexities, intersecting power relations and oppressions," the book unfortunately pushes possible allies away.
机译:凯文·默里(Kevin Murray)和丹尼尔·P·利斯顿(Daniel P. Liston)认为,我的《马克思主义与教育理论:起源与问题》一书为马克思主义教育理论提供了有用的入门知识,同时也对二十世纪对马克思主义教育框架的“先进性”进行了详尽的分析。 。”另一方面,迈克尔·苹果公司(Michael Apple)指出:尽管[马克思主义和教育理论]在一个或两个关键时刻反对经济确定性的马克思主义,但[其]提出的替代方案在很大程度上仍是恢复后的经济学马克思主义。在许多方面,这本书读起来就像是对马克思主义这一限量版的入门读物。苹果公司认为,由于其“经济减少主义”和“消除了复杂性,权力关系和压迫相交的形式化反应”,该书不幸地将可能的盟友赶走了。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Theory》 |2015年第3期|333-339|共7页
  • 作者

    Mike Cole;

  • 作者单位

    Cass School of Education and Communities University of East London;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号