首页> 外文期刊>Education management administration & leadership >School principals' leadership types and student achievement in the Italian context: Empirical results from a three-step latent class analysis
【24h】

School principals' leadership types and student achievement in the Italian context: Empirical results from a three-step latent class analysis

机译:在意大利背景下,学校校长的领导类型和学生成绩:三步潜类分析的实证结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates the existence of various leadership types in a sample of lower secondary school principals across Italy (n = 1073). Information is obtained using a questionnaire about instructional practices and leadership perceptions administered by the National Evaluation Committee for Education (INVALSI). Employing a latent class analysis (LCA) for the specification of the educational production function (EPF), we identify three subgroups of school leaders: educative leaders (49% of the total sample), who support school improvement that utilises teachers' skills; leaders who teach (35%), who are actively present in the classroom; and transactional leaders (16%), who support the school and balance various viewpoints. We then analyse the data to ascertain if some principals' individual characteristics and school context factors are statistically correlated with the probability of having certain leadership attitudes. Finally, we provide evidence that schools with 'leaders who teach' report lower academic test scores; this third step is novel as few previous studies have attempted to link leadership styles and test scores. However, the difference in test scores across groups disappears when the geographical factor is accounted for, pointing to the importance of contextual factors in that they affect both leadership types and educational outcomes.
机译:这项研究调查了整个意大利的初中校长样本中各种领导类型的存在(n = 1073)。信息是使用有关教育实践和国家教育评估委员会(INVALSI)管理的领导观念的调查表获得的。我们采用潜在类别分析(LCA)来规范教育生产功能(EPF),我们确定了学校领导者的三个子组:教育领导者(占总样本的49%),他们支持利用教师技能进行学校改进;积极参与课堂教学的领导者(占35%);和交易领导者(16%),他们支持学校并平衡各种观点。然后,我们分析数据以确定某些校长的个人特征和学校环境因素是否与某些领导态度的可能性在统计上相关。最后,我们提供的证据表明,拥有“领导者”的学校报告的学术考试成绩较低;第三步很新颖,因为以前的研究很少尝试将领导风格和考试成绩联系起来。但是,考虑到地理因素后,各组之间的考试成绩差异就消失了,这说明了情境因素的重要性,因为它们会影响领导类型和教育成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号