首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >A comparison of algal, macroinvertebrate, and fish assemblage indices for assessing low-level nutrient enrichment in wadeable Ozark streams
【24h】

A comparison of algal, macroinvertebrate, and fish assemblage indices for assessing low-level nutrient enrichment in wadeable Ozark streams

机译:比较藻类,大型无脊椎动物和鱼类的集合指数,以评估可行走的欧扎克河中低水平的营养物富集

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Biotic indices for algae, macroinvertebrates, and fish assemblages can be effective for monitoring stream enrichment, but little is known regarding the value of the three assemblages for detecting perturbance as a consequence of low-level nutrient enrichment. In the summer of 2006, we collected nutrient and biotic samples from 30 wadeable Ozark streams that spanned a nutrient-concentration gradient from reference to moderately enriched conditions. Seventy-three algal metrics, 62 macroinvertebrate metrics, and 60 fish metrics were evaluated for each of the three biotic indices. After a group of candidate metrics had been identified with multivariate analysis, correlation procedures and scatter plots were used to identify the four metrics having strongest relations to a nutrient index calculated from log transformed and normalized total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations. The four metrics selected for each of the three biotic indices were: algae-the relative abundance of most tolerant diatoms, the combined relative abundance of three species of Cymbella, mesosaprobic algae percent taxa richness, and the relative abundance of diatoms that are obligate nitrogen heterotrophs; macroinvertebrate-the relative abundance of intolerant organisms, Baetidae relative abundance, moderately tolerant taxa richness, and insect biomass; fish-herbivore and detritivore taxa richness, pool species relative abundance, fish catch per unit effort, and black bass (Micropterus spp.) relative abundance.rnAll three biotic indices were negatively correlated to nutrient concentrations but the algal index had a higher correlation (rho = -0.89) than did the macroinvertebrate and fish indices (rho = -0.63 and -0.58, respectively). Biotic index scores were lowest and nutrient concentrations were highest for streams with basins having the highest poultry and cattle production. Because of the availability of litter for fertilizer and associated increases in grass and hay production, cattle feeding capacity increases with poultry production. Studies are needed that address the synergistic effect of poultry and cattle production on Ozark streams in high production areas before ecological risks can be adequately addressed.
机译:藻类,大型无脊椎动物和鱼类组合的生物指标可以有效地监测河水的富集,但对于这三种组合检测低水平养分造成的扰动的价值知之甚少。在2006年夏季,我们从30条可访问的Ozark流收集了营养和生物样品,这些流从参考浓度到中等富集条件跨越了营养物浓度梯度。对于这三种生物指标中的每一个,评估了73个藻类指标,62个大型无脊椎动物指标和60个鱼类指标。在通过多变量分析确定了一组候选指标后,使用相关程序和散点图来确定与通过对数转换和归一化总氮和总磷浓度计算出的营养指数最相关的四个指标。为这三个生物指标中的每一个选择的四个指标是:藻类-最能容忍的硅藻的相对丰度,三种菌盖藻的总相对丰度,中近亲藻类百分比藻类丰富度以及专性氮异养藻的硅藻的相对丰度。 ;大型无脊椎动物-不耐性生物的相对丰度,et科的相对丰度,中等耐性的分类单元丰富度和昆虫生物量;鱼食草动物和有害生物分类单元的丰富度,库物种相对丰度,每单位工作量的捕捞量和黑鲈(Micropterus spp。)相对丰度。rn所有三个生物指数均与养分浓度呈负相关,但藻类指数却具有较高的相关性(rho = -0.89),而大型无脊椎动物和鱼类的指数分别为(rho = -0.63和-0.58)。对于流域而言,家禽和牛的产量最高的生物指数得分最低,养分含量最高。由于可利用垫料提供肥料,并伴随草和干草产量的增加,牛的饲养能力随着家禽产量的增加而增加。需要开展研究,以解决高风险地区家禽和牛生产对Ozark河溪流的协同作用,然后才能充分解决生态风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2010年第3期|627-638|共12页
  • 作者单位

    USGS Arkansas Water Science Center, 401 Hardin Road, Little Rock, AR 72211, United States;

    USGS Arkansas Water Science Center, 401 Hardin Road, Little Rock, AR 72211, United States;

    USCS Missouri Water Science Center, 1400 Independence Road MS 100, Rolla, MO 65401, United States;

    USGS Arkansas Water Science Center, 401 Hardin Road, Little Rock, AR 72211, United States;

    USGS Arkansas Water Science Center, 401 Hardin Road, Little Rock, AR 72211, United States;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    nutrient; algae; macroinvertebrate; fish; metric; biotic index; cattle; poultry;

    机译:养分;藻类大型无脊椎动物鱼;度量生物指数牛家禽;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:45:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号