首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >A comparison of methods for estimating common vole (Microtus arvalis) abundance in agricultural habitats
【24h】

A comparison of methods for estimating common vole (Microtus arvalis) abundance in agricultural habitats

机译:农业生境中常见田鼠丰度估算方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rodent outbreaks cause significant crop damages in agricultural areas worldwide, but routinely monitoring large areas at low cost remains a challenge. The common vole Microtus arvalis has recently colonized the agricultural plains of the northern Iberian Plateau, an area where it has started to produce population outbreaks with important impacts in agriculture, the environment and human health. Vole monitoring has become of prime importance to implement preventive management measures to control populations. In order to find a simple and reliable vole monitoring method to be applied in large areas, we compared abundance estimates derived from three methods: capture-mark-recapture (CMR), single capture events (SCE) and presence/absence of vole activity signs (VAS) during three seasons and on the main agricultural habitats in the study area. We show that an activity index based on the presence of fresh droppings and/or clippings had a similar performance to SCE in a large sample of plots (n=222) across habitats and seasons. Data obtained with both methods (SCE, VAS) were also well correlated with those obtained with CMR, despite a limited sample size (n= 23 CMR plots). We suggest that the VAS method, which is a cheaper and easier alternative to trapping methods, provides a promising tool for scientists and managers to implement large scale monitoring of common vole in agricultural areas.
机译:啮齿动物的暴发对全世界的农业地区造成了严重的农作物破坏,但是常规地以低成本监测大面积土地仍然是一个挑战。普通田鼠田鼠最近在伊比利亚高原北部的农业平原上定居,该地区已开始引起人口暴发,对农业,环境和人类健康产生重要影响。田鼠监测已成为实施预防性控制措施以控制种群的最重要手段。为了找到一种简单而可靠的田鼠监测方法,我们比较了从三种方法得出的丰度估计值:捕获标记捕获(CMR),单次捕获事件(SCE)和田鼠活动迹象的存在/不存在(VAS)在三个季节以及研究区域的主要农业生境上。我们显示,在整个生境和季节的大块样地(n = 222)中,基于新鲜粪便和/或剪枝的存在的活动指数与SCE具有相似的性能。尽管样本量有限(n = 23 CMR图),但通过两种方法(SCE,VAS)获得的数据也与通过CMR获得的数据相关性很好。我们建议,VAS方法是诱捕方法的一种更便宜,更容易的替代方法,它为科学家和管理人员提供了一个有前途的工具,可用于对农业地区的田鼠进行大规模监测。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2014年第1期|111-119|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Instituto de Investigacion en Recursos Cinegeticos, IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain;

    Instituto de Investigacion en Recursos Cinegeticos, IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain;

    Depto. Ciencias Agroforestales, Escuela Tecnica Superior de Ingenierias Agrarias, Universidad de Valladolid, Avda. de Madrid 44.34004 Palencia, Spain,Institute Universitario de Investigacion en Gestion Forestai Sostenible, Spain;

    Instituto de Investigacion en Recursos Cinegeticos, IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain;

    Instituto de Investigacion en Recursos Cinegeticos, IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain;

    Instituto de Investigacion en Recursos Cinegeticos, IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain,Estacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas (EEZA-CSIC), Almeria, Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Indirect abundance index; Trapping; Spain; Alfalfa; Clipping; Dropping;

    机译:间接丰度指数;诱捕;西班牙;苜蓿;剪裁;掉落;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号