首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Integrating indices to evaluate the effect of artificial restoration based on different comparisons in the Wanglang Nature Reserve
【24h】

Integrating indices to evaluate the effect of artificial restoration based on different comparisons in the Wanglang Nature Reserve

机译:基于不同比较的王朗自然保护区综合指标评估人工修复的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To develop the indices to evaluate the effects of artificial restoration during forest restoration, we tested the validity of indices integrated at the Wanglang Nature Reserve by studying the characteristics of an artificial forest based on different comparisons of primary forest, secondary forest, giant panda habitat, and the surrounding environment. The results indicated that the characteristics of the artificial forest and the different comparisons were well described and distinguished by the vegetation coverage, species composition and richness, community structure, tree growth status indices. The artificial forest was different from the primary forest in a number of woody plants in different layers; different from secondary forest in species richness and tree growth status; different from giant panda habitat in trees and bamboo; and different from the surrounding environment in bamboo coverage, species richness, and community structure. Meanwhile, the artificial forest had a more homogeneous tree size than the comparisons. Based on these results, we suggest that an evaluation of the effect of forest restoration should be related to specific factors, because the effects of artificial restoration differ depending on the evaluation standard. We conclude that the indices used in this study can be used to evaluate the effect of artificial restoration, which is useful for forest restoration in Wanglang Nature Reserve and elsewhere.
机译:为了开发评估森林恢复过程中人工恢复效果的指标,我们根据原始森林,次生森林,大熊猫栖息地,和周围的环境。结果表明,人工林的特征及其比较比较可以通过植被覆盖度,物种组成和丰富度,群落结构,树木生长状况指标得到很好的描述和区分。人造森林与原始森林的不同之处在于许多不同层次的木本植物。与次生林的物种丰富度和树木生长状况不同;与大熊猫栖息在树木和竹子中不同;并且与周围环境的竹子覆盖,物种丰富度和群落结构不同。同时,人造林的树木比同类树木更大。根据这些结果,我们建议对森林恢复的效果进行评估应与特定因素相关,因为人工恢复的效果随评估标准的不同而不同。我们得出的结论是,本研究中使用的指标可用于评估人工恢复的效果,这对于王朗自然保护区和其他地区的森林恢复很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号