...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Accounting for Raw Material Embodied in Imports by Multi-regional Input- Output Modelling and Life Cycle Assessment, Using Finland as a Study Case
【24h】

Accounting for Raw Material Embodied in Imports by Multi-regional Input- Output Modelling and Life Cycle Assessment, Using Finland as a Study Case

机译:通过多区域投入产出模型和生命周期评估,对进口商品中包含的原材料进行核算,以芬兰为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The two main methods used to estimate raw material embodied in imports are life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-regional input-output (MRIO) models. The key advantage of LCA is its higher product resolution but it relies on global or regional averages, which could bias results. Our outcomes suggest that this obstacle could be avoided for primary goods if domestic process data are collected, since the necessary raw materials are mostly extracted from the environment of the direct trade partner. Conversely, for many other products, intermediate inputs are produced following a wide range of blueprints and cross multiple borders, which makes it challenging to determine how and where raw materials needed for their production originate. For these products, a method to combine the superior coverage of MRIO with the product resolution of LCA is evaluated here, using imports to Finland as a study case. The analysis provides insights on how to identify critical supply chains and illustrates a relatively simple, replicable solution that can be used in other regions or environmental accounts. Nevertheless, the existing resolution of MRIO models and dissimilarities in classifications between the two tools could constitute a new source of errors if not properly handled.
机译:估计进口所含原材料的两种主要方法是生命周期评估(LCA)模型和多区域投入产出(MRIO)模型。 LCA的主要优势在于其较高的产品分辨率,但它依赖于全球或区域平均值,这可能会导致结果偏差。我们的结果表明,如果收集国内过程数据,则可以避免初级商品的这一障碍,因为必要的原材料大部分是从直接贸易伙伴的环境中提取的。相反,对于许多其他产品,中间投入品是根据各种各样的蓝图和跨多个边界生产的,这使得确定生产其所需原料的方式和来源具有挑战性。对于这些产品,此处评估了将MRIO的覆盖范围与LCA的产品分辨率相结合的方法,并以对芬兰的进口为研究案例。该分析提供了有关如何识别关键供应链的见解,并说明了可以在其他地区或环境帐户中使用的相对简单,可复制的解决方案。然而,如果处理不当,MRIO模型的现有分辨率和两种工具之间的分类差异可能构成新的错误来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号