首页> 外文期刊>Early Childhood Education Journal >Frequency of Six Early Childhood Education Approaches: A 10-Year Content Analysis of Early Childhood Education Journal
【24h】

Frequency of Six Early Childhood Education Approaches: A 10-Year Content Analysis of Early Childhood Education Journal

机译:六种幼儿教育方法的频率:十年期幼儿教育内容分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The frequency of early childhood education approaches spanning 10 years of publications was investigated. A content analysis of publications (N = 492) from Early Childhood Education Journal was conducted. From a previous content analysis six approaches or search words were identified: Bank Street, Head Start, High/Scope, Montessori, Reggio Emilia, and Waldorf. Overall, the current content analysis demonstrated that the Head Start approach most frequently appeared. The results indicate that approaches vary as to their frequency of appearance and that contributors of Early Childhood Education Journal have investigated, reflected upon, and expanded upon approaches to educating young children to different degrees. This finding may be beneficial to future contributors of Early Childhood Education Journal. In addition, we have provided a brief overview of each approach that early childhood professionals may use to aid parents with their early childhood education enrollment decisions.
机译:调查了早于十年出版的儿童早期教育方法的频率。对《幼儿教育杂志》的出版物(N = 492)进行了内容分析。从先前的内容分析中,确定了六个方法或搜索词:银行街,抢先体验,高级/范围,蒙台梭利,雷焦艾米利亚和华尔道夫。总体而言,当前的内容分析表明,最先出现的“开始”方法。结果表明,方法的出现频率各不相同,《早期儿童教育杂志》的撰稿人已经研究,反思和扩展了对幼儿进行不同程度教育的方法。这一发现可能对《早期儿童教育杂志》的未来撰稿人有益。此外,我们还简要介绍了幼儿专业人士可用来协助父母进行幼儿入学决定的每种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号