...
首页> 外文期刊>Statistica neerlandica >A comment on Mendes and Yigit (2013), Type Ⅰ error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments',Statistics Neerlandica, 67:1-26
【24h】

A comment on Mendes and Yigit (2013), Type Ⅰ error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments',Statistics Neerlandica, 67:1-26

机译:评论Mendes and Yigit(2013),阶乘实验中交互作用效应的不同测试的Ⅰ型误差和测试功效',统计Neerlandica,67:1-26

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In their advocacy of the rank-transformation (RT) technique for analysis of data from factorial designs, Mendes and Yigit (Statistica Neerlandica, 67, 2013, 1-26) missed important analytical studies identifying the statistical shortcomings of the RT technique, the recommendation that the RT technique not be used, and important advances that have been made for properly analyzing data in a non-parametric setting. Applied data analysts are at risk of being misled by Mendes and Yigit, when statistically sound techniques are available for the proper non-parametric analysis of data from factorial designs. The appropriate methods express hypotheses in terms of normalized distribution functions, and the test statistics account for variance heterogeneity.
机译:Mendes和Yigit(Statistica Neerlandica,67,2013,1-26)在倡导使用阶跃变换(RT)技术分析因子设计数据的过程中,错过了重要的分析研究,这些研究确定了RT技术的统计缺陷,建议不使用RT技术,以及在非参数设置中正确分析数据所取得的重要进展。当统计上合理的技术可用于对析因设计的数据进行适当的非参数分析时,应用数据分析师就有被Mendes和Yigit所误导的风险。适当的方法根据归一化分布函数表达假设,而检验统计量则说明了方差异质性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号