首页> 外文期刊>Discourse Processes >Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory
【24h】

Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory

机译:评价概念隐喻理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A major revolution in the study of metaphor occurred 30 years ago with the introduction of “conceptual metaphor theory” (CMT). Unlike previous theories of metaphor and metaphorical meaning, CMT proposed that metaphor is not just an aspect of language, but a fundamental part of human thought. Indeed, most metaphorical language arises from preexisting patterns of metaphorical thought or conceptual metaphors. This article provides an evaluation of the linguistic and psychological evidence supporting CMT, and responds to some of the criticisms of CMT offered by scholars within cognitive science. Some new ways of thinking of conceptual metaphors from the perspective of embodied simulations and dynamical systems theory are also presented.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103
机译:30年前,随着“概念隐喻理论”(CMT)的引入,隐喻研究发生了重大革命。与以前的隐喻和隐喻意义理论不同,CMT提出隐喻不仅是语言的一个方面,而且是人类思想的基本组成部分。确实,大多数隐喻语言都源于隐喻思想或概念隐喻的既有模式。本文对支持CMT的语言和心理证据进行了评估,并回应了认知科学领域的学者对CMT提出的一些批评。还提出了一些从具体化的仿真和动力学系统理论的角度来思考概念隐喻的新方法。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati ,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布编号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号