...
首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Accountability and Inaction: NGOs and Resource Lodging in Development
【24h】

Accountability and Inaction: NGOs and Resource Lodging in Development

机译:问责与不作为:非政府组织与发展中的资源住宿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

From the late 1980s, research on NGOs had a normative focus and was vulnerable to changing donor preoccupations. This article contributes a new conceptual approach, analysing the practices through which relationships and resources are translated into programmes and projects. The theoretical justification for this move combines the new ethnography of development practice with a re-agency approach to transactions across time and space. The study is based on data including thirty hours of video ethnography involving interviews and field visits with Kenyan NGOs in a variety of sectors. The analysis focuses on the problem of accountability that emerged through the interactions of donors and state corruption. We argue that NGOs operating in capital cities often provide organizational solutions to this problem. Depending on donor preferences, varying amounts of resources become 'lodged' or absorbed in 'capital NGOs' as they provide accounts of programmes that satisfy donors. However, no matter the donor preferences, capital NGOs provide accountability independently of increased action with communities or increased resources transferred to them. We conclude that the institu-tionalization of the NGO field as a well-grounded specialization depends in part on the degree to which researchers can sideline the stories generated in inter-organizational contexts such as workshops and policy meetings, and substitute understandings based on accounting practices, resource flows and social ties.
机译:从1980年代后期开始,对非政府组织的研究一直以规范为重点,并且容易受到捐助者关注的变化的影响。本文提供了一种新的概念方法,分析了将关系和资源转化为计划和项目的实践。此举的理论依据是将发展实践的新民族志方法与跨时空交易的重新代理方法相结合。这项研究基于包括三十个小时的视频人种志研究在内的数据,涉及对肯尼亚各个部门的非政府组织的采访和实地访问。该分析着重于通过捐助者与国家腐败的相互作用而出现的问责制问题。我们认为,在首都开展业务的非政府组织通常会提供针对此问题的组织解决方案。根据捐赠者的偏好,不同数量的资源会被“存放”或吸收到“资本非政府组织”中,因为它们提供了使捐赠者满意的计划。但是,无论捐助者的偏好如何,首都非政府组织都可以独立于社区采取的行动或转移给社区的资源而提供问责制。我们得出的结论是,非政府组织领域的制度化是有充分基础的专业化,部分取决于研究人员可以在多大程度上在组织间环境下(例如研讨会和政策会议)产生的故事进行旁注,并根据会计惯例来替代理解。 ,资源流动和社会纽带。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2010年第2期|p.253-278|共26页
  • 作者单位

    Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes at Arizona State University;

    Department of Sociology, University of Nairobi, Kenya;

    Louisiana State University and Secretary of the Society for Social Studies of Science;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号