首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Putting Two and Two Together? Early Childhood Education, Mothers' Employment and Care Service Expansion in Chile and Mexico
【24h】

Putting Two and Two Together? Early Childhood Education, Mothers' Employment and Care Service Expansion in Chile and Mexico

机译:将两个和两个放在一起?智利和墨西哥的幼儿教育,母亲的就业和护理服务扩展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years, several middle-income countries, including Chile, Mexico and Uruguay, have increased the availability of early childhood education and care (ECEC) services. These developments have received little scholarly attention so far, resulting in the (surely unintended) impression that Latin American social policy is tied to a familialist track, when in reality national and regional trends are more varied and complex. This article looks at recent efforts to expand ECEC services in Chile and Mexico. In spite of similar concerns over low female labour force participation and child welfare, the approaches of the two countries to service expansion have differed significantly. While the Mexican programme aims to kick-start and subsidize home- and community-based care provision, with a training component for childminders, the Chilean programme emphasizes the expansion of professional ECEC services provided in public institutions. By comparing the two programmes, this article shows that differences in policy design have important implications in terms of the opportunities the programmes are able to create for women and children from low-income families, and in terms of the programmes' impacts on gender and class inequalities. It also ventures some hypotheses about why the two countries may have chosen such different routes.
机译:近年来,几个中等收入国家,包括智利,墨西哥和乌拉圭,已经增加了幼儿教育和护理(ECEC)服务的可用性。到目前为止,这些事态发展在学术上很少受到关注,导致(肯定是无意的)印象是,拉丁美洲的社会政策实际上是与家族主义联系在一起的,而实际上,国家和地区的趋势则更加多样化和复杂。本文着眼于最近在智利和墨西哥扩大ECEC服务的努力。尽管人们对女性劳动力参与率低和儿童福利存在类似的担忧,但两国扩大服务范围的方法却大不相同。墨西哥计划旨在通过为儿童保育人员提供培训内容来启动和补贴家庭和社区护理服务,而智利计划则强调扩大公共机构提供的专业ECEC服务。通过比较这两个方案,本文表明,政策设计的差异对于方案能够为低收入家庭的妇女和儿童创造机会以及方案对性别和阶级的影响具有重要意义。不平等。它还提出了一些关于为什么两国可能选择这种不同路线的假设。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2011年第4期|p.1079-1107|共29页
  • 作者

    Silke Staab; Roberto Gerhard;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Northumberland Road, S10 2TU, UK;

    Political Science and International Relations at the Center for Research and Teaching in Economics (CIDE), Mexico;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号