首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >How do Investors Value Environmental Harm/Care? Private Equity Funds, Development Finance Institutions and the Partial Financialization of Nature-based Industries
【24h】

How do Investors Value Environmental Harm/Care? Private Equity Funds, Development Finance Institutions and the Partial Financialization of Nature-based Industries

机译:投资者如何看待环境危害/关怀?私募股权基金,发展金融机构与自​​然产业的部分金融化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Private equity funds, mostly domiciled in secrecy jurisdictions, are dominant investors in the resource-based economies of Africa. Some of the investments that these funds make have been speculative and based on perceived high-value 'futures' in biodiversity, bio-fuels and land, carbon capture or strategic minerals. However, private equity funds are also heavily invested in mining, energy and infrastructure, which also generate wealth from the non-human world; 'old' markets alongside the 'new' markets for discovered nature-based commodities. This article reviews how private equity funds, and their partners in development finance institutions, frame and value the consequential impact of their industries on people and things. It then explores how this valuation, and other related calculative technologies of 'concern' for the 'environment' - such as risk assessment and offsetting - are incorporated into firms' investment decision making. This enquiry finds that: 1) financiers currently employ thin, partial and pseudo-mathematical methods of assessing environmental impact and worth; and 2) that environmental and developmental impact 'science' is a performative technology, with only marginal relation to the material world it seeks to measure and protect. Using calculative technologies in which financial considerations are privileged, financiers have wrought a dissociated, incomplete and partial valorization of the non-human world. Nonetheless, 3) these calculative devices assist in legitimizing private equity funds as institutional leaders in pre-existing power structures which exploit natural resources in Africa for the benefit of money-holders. These propositions roughly correspond to the technical, empirical and theoretical dimensions of a socio-technical arrangement applying to nature-based accumulation, which, overall, performs a political process of financialization.
机译:私募股权基金主要居住在保密管辖区,是非洲资源型经济体的主要投资者。这些资金进行的一些投资是投机性的,基于生物多样性,生物燃料和土地,碳捕获或战略性矿产的高价值“未来”。但是,私募股权基金也大量投资于采矿,能源和基础设施,这也从非人类世界中产生了财富;发现的基于自然的商品的“旧”市场和“新”市场。本文回顾了私募股权基金及其在发展金融机构中的合作伙伴如何构架和评估其行业对人和物产生的影响。然后,它探讨了如何将这种估值以及其他与“环境”有关的“风险”计算技术(例如风险评估和抵消)纳入公司的投资决策。这项调查发现:1)金融家目前采用薄,部分和伪数学方法评估环境影响和价值; 2)环境和发展影响“科学”是一种表演性技术,与它试图衡量和保护的物质世界仅有边际关系。金融家们使用能够优先考虑财务因素的计算技术,对非人类世界进行了孤立,不完整和部分的估价。但是,3)这些计算手段有助于使私募股权基金合法化,成为现有权力结构中的机构领导者,这些权力结构利用非洲的自然资源造福于货币持有者。这些主张大致对应于适用于基于自然的积累的社会技术安排的技术,经验和理论维度,总的来说,这执行了金融化的政治过程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2012年第1期|p.271-293|共23页
  • 作者

    Sarah Bracking;

  • 作者单位

    Development in the School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester,UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号