首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >The Decimation and Displacement of Development Economics
【24h】

The Decimation and Displacement of Development Economics

机译:发展经济学的衰落与位移

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contemporary mainstream development economics is an overdetermined product of three historical processes: the late neoclassical turn within mainstream economic theory; transformations within the institutional-discursive matrix of development, from growth-centred policies to poverty alleviation- and good governance-oriented policies; and a broader transition from post-war Keynesian developmentalism (with its variants in the second and third worlds) to existing varieties of neoliberal governmentality. This article assesses the trajectory of development economics through two historical shifts in the theoretical field. The first is from the old' school of structural transformation with a focus on sectoral balance and shifts to the new' school of structural adjustment programmes with a focus on micro-level incentive problems. The second shift is from the aggressively neoclassical orientation of the new' school to that of the contemporary constellation, where what is considered to be good' development economics has beengraduallyreduced to micro-level impact appraisals of developmental projects (the so-called randomization approach'), while the broader macro-economic and historical questions are being increasingly handled through methodologically-individualist, late neoclassical models of institutions and growth (the so-called new institutionalism').The article concludes by insisting on the need for a new paradigm of development economics that would not only unearth the conflictual and antagonistic nature of development, but alsorender it an indispensable dimension of thestudy of development in a pluralist manner.
机译:当代主流发展经济学是三个历史过程的决定性产物:主流经济学理论中晚期的新古典主义转向;在发展体制-体制分散矩阵内的转变,从以增长为中心的政策到以扶贫和善治为导向的政策;以及从战后凯恩斯主义的发展主义(在第二和第三世界有所不同)到现有的新自由主义政府形式的广泛过渡。本文通过理论领域的两次历史变迁来评估发展经济学的轨迹。首先是从原来的结构转型学校着眼于部门平衡,然后是从新的结构调整计划学校转向了微观激励机制。第二个转变是从新学校的激进的新古典主义取向转变为当代的星座,在这里,被认为是良好的发展经济学已逐渐减少到发展项目的微观影响评估(所谓的随机化方法)。 ),尽管越来越广泛的宏观经济和历史问题通过方法论上的个人主义,制度和增长的新古典主义晚期模型(所谓的新制度主义')得到了越来越多的解决。本文的结论是坚持需要一种新的范式发展经济学不仅会发掘发展的冲突和对抗性质,而且还会以多元化的方式使发展经济学成为发展研究中不可或缺的一个方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号