...
首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Human Development and Decent Work: Why some Concepts Succeed and Others Fail to Make an Impact
【24h】

Human Development and Decent Work: Why some Concepts Succeed and Others Fail to Make an Impact

机译:人类发展和体面劳动:为什么某些概念成功而另一些概念却未能产生影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article examines the impact of the International Labour Organization's concept of Decent Work on development thinking and the academic literature. We attempt to answer the question of what makes a development initiative successful by comparing the decent work approach to the United Nation Development Programme's Human Development concept (in conjunction with the human development indicator). We consider that the latter has been one of the most successful development concepts ever to have been launched, while the impact of decent work by comparison has been limited. Our hypothesis relating to the question of what makes a development initiative successful has three fundamental components: first, a solid theoretical foundation has to justify the launch of a development concept. A second vital factor is the availability of sufficient national and internationally comparable data that enables researchers and policy makers alike to apply the concept, preferably by means of a synthetic indicator. Third, the political will and institutional structure of the development institution that launches a concept is a key factor, particularly if data availability is limited as countries then have to be persuaded to generate new data.
机译:本文探讨了国际劳工组织的体面劳动概念对发展思想和学术文献的影响。我们试图通过比较体面劳动方法与联合国开发计划署的人类发展概念(结合人类发展指标)来回答使发展计划成功的问题。我们认为,后者是有史以来最成功的发展概念之一,而相比之下体面劳动的影响是有限的。我们关于使开发计划成功的问题的假设具有三个基本组成部分:首先,必须有扎实的理论基础来证明开发概念的推出是正确的。第二个至关重要的因素是是否有足够的国家和国际可比数据,使研究人员和政策制定者都可以应用这一概念,最好是通过综合指标来应用。第三,发起一个概念的发展机构的政治意愿和体制结构是一个关键因素,尤其是在数据可用性有限的情况下,因为必须说服各国来生成新数据。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2015年第2期|197-224|共28页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for New Development Thinking at the Faculty of Economics and Business at the University of Chile;

    Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge and Fellow of Magdalene College, Cambridge;

    Centre for New Development Thinking at the Faculty of Economics and Business at the University of Chile;

    Social Policies at the European Trade Union Institute;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号