首页> 外文期刊>Social Media + Society >Social Media and Trust in Scientific Expertise: Debating the Covid-19 Pandemic in The Netherlands
【24h】

Social Media and Trust in Scientific Expertise: Debating the Covid-19 Pandemic in The Netherlands

机译:社交媒体和科学专业知识的信任:在荷兰辩论Covid-19大流行病

获取原文
       

摘要

This article examines the role of social media dynamics in the public exchange of information between scientists (experts), government (policy-makers), mass media (journalists), and citizens (nonexperts) during the first 4months after the Covid-19 outbreak in the Netherlands. Over the past decade, the institutional model of science communication, based on linear vectors of information flows between institutions, has gradually converted into a networked model where social media propel information flows circulating between all actors involved. The question driving our research is, “How are social media deployed to both undermine and enhance public trust in scientific expertise during a health crisis?” Analyzing the public debate during the period of the corona outbreak in the Netherlands, we investigate two stages: the emergency response phase and the “smart exit strategy” phase, discussing how scientific experts, policy-makers, journalists, and citizens appropriate social media logic to steer information and to control the debate. We conclude by outlining the potential risks and benefits of adopting social media dynamics in institutional contexts of science communication.
机译:本文介绍了社会媒体动态在科学家(专家),政府(政策制定者)​​,大众媒体(记者)和Covid-19爆发后的第一个4个月期间的公民交流的作用,在第一次4个月期间荷兰人。在过去十年中,基于机构之间的信息流量的线性向量的科学传播的制度模式逐渐转换为网络模型,其中社交媒体推进信息流在所有涉及的行动者之间流动。推动我们的研究的问题是,“社交媒体如何在健康危机中削弱和加强对科学专业知识的公众信任?”在荷兰的电晕爆发期间分析公众辩论,我们调查了两个阶段:应急响应阶段和“智能退出战略”阶段,讨论科学专家,政策制定者,记者和公民适当的社交媒体逻辑转向信息并控制辩论。我们通过概述在科学传播的制度背景下采用社交媒体动态的潜在风险和益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号