首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Comparing methods to secure a tracheal tube placed via a surgical cricothyroidotomy: a randomised controlled study in cadavers
【24h】

Comparing methods to secure a tracheal tube placed via a surgical cricothyroidotomy: a randomised controlled study in cadavers

机译:比较通过手术克里克酚蛋白酶诱导的气管管的方法:尸体中随机对照研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the ‘can’t intubate can’t oxygenate’ scenario, techniques to achieve front of neck access to the airway have been described in the literature but there is a lack of guidance on the optimal method for securing the tracheal tube (TT) placed during this procedure. The aim of this study was to compare three different methods of securing a TT to prevent extubation following a surgical cricothyroidotomy. A randomised controlled trial was undertaken. The population studied were emergency physicians (EPs) attending a cadaveric airway course. The intervention was securing a TT placed via a surgical cricothyroidotomy by suture. The comparison was securing the TT using fabric tape with two different tying techniques. The primary outcome was the force required to extubate the trachea. The trial was registered with ANZCTR.org.au (ACTRN12621000320853). 17 emergency physicians completed intubations using all three of the securing methods on 12 cadavers for a total of 51 experiments. The mean extubation force was 6.54 KG (95?% CI 5.54–7.55) in the suture group compared with 2.28 KG (95?% CI 1.91–2.64) in the ‘Wilko tie’ group and 2.12 KG (95?% CI 1.63–2.60) in the ‘Lark’s foot tie’ group; The mean difference between the suture and fabric tie techniques was significant (p??0.001). Following a surgical cricothyroidotomy in cadavers, EPs were able to effectively secure a TT using a suture technique, and this method was superior to tying the TT using fabric tape.
机译:在“不能插管不能含氧化合物”情景中,在文献中已经描述了实现对气道前面的颈部进入前面的技术,但缺乏关于固定气管管(TT)的最佳方法的指导在此过程中。本研究的目的是比较三种不同的方法来保护TT以防止外科克里克酚脱臼后拔管。进行了随机对照试验。研究的人口是参加尸体气道课程的急诊医生(EPS)。干预通过缝合线通过手术克里克酚酶术治疗TT。比较是使用具有两种不同捆绑技术的织物胶带来确保TT。主要结果是拔管气管所需的力。该试验在Anzctr.org.au(ACTRN12621000320853)中注册。 17急诊医生在12个尸体上使用三种固定方法完成插管,共51个实验。平均拔管力在缝合线组中为6.54千克(95μl5.54-7.55),而“Wilko Tie”组和2.12千克(95 kg(95μl1.91-2.64)相比(95 kg1.91-2.64)。(95 kg 1.63- 2.60)在“百灵的脚踏系”中;缝合线和织物系带技术的平均差异很大(p≤≤0.001)。在尸体中的手术克里克替司芹素后,EPS能够使用缝合技术有效地固定TT,并且该方法优于使用织物带捆绑TT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号