...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of molecular cell biology >Molecular basis for the functions of dominantly active Y35N and inactive D60K Rheb mutants in mTORC1 signaling
【24h】

Molecular basis for the functions of dominantly active Y35N and inactive D60K Rheb mutants in mTORC1 signaling

机译:MTORC1信号传导中统治活性Y35N和无活性D60K RhEB突变体的分子基础

获取原文
           

摘要

Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) serves as a central regulator of cell growth and proliferation by integrating signals from growth factors, nutrients, energy status, and cellular stress (Saxton and Sabatini, 2017). A small GTPase, called Ras homolog enriched in brain (Rheb), is a positive regulator of mTORC1. Like other small GTPases, the function of Rheb is dictated by its guanine nucleotide binding states: it is active in the GTP-bound form and inactive in the GDP-bound form (Aspuria and Tamanoi, 2004). Crystal structures of Rheb in complexes with GDP, GTP, and GppNHp (a nonhydrolysable GTP analog) revealed that major conformational change takes place in the switch I region during the GTP–GDP transition (Yu et al., 2005). Cryo-EM structure of mTORC1 in complex with GTP-bound Rheb suggested an allosteric mechanism for mTORC1 activation by Rheb (Yang et al., 2017). Intriguingly, the interaction of Rheb with mTOR is relatively weak and in a nucleotide-independent manner, which is different from the interactions of classical Ras proteins with their effectors (Long et al., 2005). Nevertheless, the functional data showed that only the GTP-bound Rheb can activate mTOR (Yang et al., 2017). So far, multiple Rheb mutants have been identified (Heard et al., 2014). Among them, the Y35A mutant exhibited increased intrinsic GTPase activity and its overexpression reduced the activation of mTORC1 by growth factor availability, and thus is deemed as a loss-of-function mutant (Mazhab-Jafari et al., 2012; Heard et al., 2014). Surprisingly, the Y35N mutant, which was initially identified in several human cancers (Lawrence et al., 2014), could significantly increase the phosphorylation level of mTORC1 substrate S6K1 compared to the wild-type (WT) Rheb, and thus is regarded as a constitutively active mutant (Grabiner et al., 2014; Heard et al., 2014). On the other hand, the D60K mutant was shown to be unable to bind to Mg2t or the nucleotide (either GTP or GDP) and hence to assume a nucleotide-free form; thus, it is regarded as a dominantly inactive mutant and widely used as a negative control in the functional study of mTORC1 activation (Tabancay et al., 2003). However, how the Y35N and D60K mutations alter the proper function of Rheb in the activation of mTORC1 signaling remains unclear.
机译:哺乳动物的雷帕霉素络合物1(MTORC1)的靶标通过将来自生长因子,营养素,能源状态和细胞压力(Saxton和Sabatini,2017)的信号集成来作为细胞生长和增殖的中央调节因子。一种名为RAS同源物的小GTP酶,富含大脑(RHEB),是MTORC1的阳性调节剂。与其他小GTP酶一样,RhEB的功能由其鸟嘌呤核苷酸结合状态决定:它在GTP结合的形式中活性和以GDP结合的形式无活性(Aspuria和Tamanoi,2004)。 RHEB的晶体结构与GDP,GTP和GPPNHP(非水解GTP类似物)的晶体结构显示,在GTP-GDP转换期间,在开关I区域发生主要构象变化(Yu等人,2005)。 MTORC1的Cryo-EM结构与GTP结合的Rheb中的复合物提出了Rheb的MTORC1激活的变构机制(Yang等,2017)。有趣的是,RHEB与mTOR的相互作用相对较弱,含有核苷酸无关的方式,其与典型RAS蛋白与其作用的相互作用不同(Long等,2005)。然而,功能数据显示只有GTP结合的RHEB可以激活MTOR(Yang等,2017)。到目前为止,已经确定了多个RhEB突变体(听到et al。,2014)。其中,Y35A突变体表现出增加的内在GTP酶活性,其过表达通过生长因子可用性降低了MTORC1的活化,因此被认为是函数突变体(MAZHAB-JAFARI等,2012;听到等人。 ,2014)。令人惊讶的是,与野生型(WT)Rheb相比,最初在几种人类癌症中鉴定的Y35N突变体(Lawrence等,2014)中,可以显着增加MTORC1底物S6K1的磷酸化水平,因此被视为一个组成型活性突变体(Grabiner等,2014年;听到等人,2014年)。另一方面,D60K突变体显示出不能与Mg2T或核苷酸(GTP或GDP)结合,因此呈现无核苷酸形式;因此,它被认为是主要的活性突变体,并且广泛用作MTORC1激活功能研究中的阴性对照(Tabancay等,2003)。然而,Y35N和D60K突变如何改变RHEB在MTORC1信号传导的激活中的适当功能仍然不清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号