首页> 外文期刊>BMC Rheumatology >Researchers’ perspectives on methodological challenges and outcomes selection in interventional studies targeting medication adherence in rheumatic diseases: an OMERACT-adherence study
【24h】

Researchers’ perspectives on methodological challenges and outcomes selection in interventional studies targeting medication adherence in rheumatic diseases: an OMERACT-adherence study

机译:研究人员对介入研究中的方法论挑战和结果选择的观点,旨在治疗血压疾病中的药物依恋:杂乱无章研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Research on adherence interventions in rheumatology is limited by methodological issues, particularly heterogeneous outcomes. We aimed to describe researchers’ experiences with conducting interventional studies targeting medication adherence in rheumatology and their perspectives on establishing core outcomes. Semi-structured interviews using audio conference were conducted with researchers who had conducted an adherence study of any design in the past 10?years. Data collection and thematic analysis were performed iteratively, until saturation. We interviewed 13 researchers, most of whom worked in academia and specialized in epidemiology and/or health services research. We identified three themes: 1) improving measurement of adherence (considering all phases of adherence, using appropriate and relevant measures, and establishing clinically meaningful thresholds); 2) challenges in designing and appraising adherence intervention studies (considering the confusion over a plethora of outcomes, difficulties with powering studies to demonstrate meaningful changes, and suboptimal descriptions of adherence interventions in published studies); and 3) advancing outcome assessment in adherence intervention studies (capturing rationale for developing a core domain set as well as recommendations and anticipated challenges by participants). Uniquely gathering perspectives from international adherence researchers, our findings led to researcher-informed recommendations for improving adherence research including specifying the targeted adherence phase in designing interventions and studies and providing a glossary of terms to promote consistency in reporting. We also identified recommendations for developing a core domain set for interventional studies targeting medication adherence including involvement of patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders and methodological and practical considerations to establish rigor and support uptake.
机译:风湿病学中的粘附干预的研究受到方法论问题,特别是异质结果的限制。我们的旨在描述研究人员对旨在针对风湿病学中药物依恋的介入研究及其关于建立核心结果的观点的经验。使用音频会议的半结构化访谈与在过去10年中进行任何设计的依从性研究的研究人员进行了。迭代地进行数据收集和主题分析,直到饱和度。我们采访了13名研究人员,大多数人在学术界工作,专门用于流行病学和/或医疗服务研究。我们确定了三个主题:1)改善依从性的测量(考虑所有遵守阶段,使用适当和相关措施,并建立临床有意义的阈值); 2)设计和评估依从性干预研究的挑战(考虑到困扰过多的结果,有困难的推动研究表明有意义的变化,以及发表研究中的依从性干预措施的次优的描述); 3)推进依从性干预研究的成果评估(捕捉用于制定核心领域集的理由以及参与者的建议和预期的挑战)。我们的调查结果从国际依从性研究人员获取唯一聚集的视角,导致研究员知识的建议,了解改善遵守研究,包括在设计干预和研究中指定目标遵守阶段,并提供术语表以促进报告中的一致性。我们还确定了为开发介入研究制定核心领域的建议,该研究旨在针对药物依从性,包括患者,临床医生和其他利益攸关方和方法论和实践考虑来建立严格和支持的方法和实践考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号