首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement With Scientific Information—A Literature Review
【24h】

Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement With Scientific Information—A Literature Review

机译:在线参与与科学信息的制约和可承受 - 论文综述

获取原文
       

摘要

Many urgent problems that societies currently face—from climate change to a global pandemic—require citizens to engage with scientific information as members of democratic societies as well as to solve problems in their personal lives. Most often, to solve their epistemic aims (aims directed at achieving knowledge and understanding) regarding such socio-scientific issues, individuals search for information online, where there exists a multitude of possibly relevant and highly interconnected sources of different perspectives, sometimes providing conflicting information. The paper provides a review of the literature aimed at identifying (a) constraints and affordances that scientific knowledge and the online information environment entail and (b) individuals' cognitive and motivational processes that have been found to hinder, or conversely, support practices of engagement (such as critical information evaluation or two-sided dialogue). Doing this, a conceptual framework for understanding and fostering what we call online engagement with scientific information is introduced, which is conceived as consisting of individual engagement (engaging on one's own in the search, selection, evaluation, and integration of information) and dialogic engagement (engaging in discourse with others to interpret, articulate and critically examine scientific information). In turn, this paper identifies individual and contextual conditions for individuals' goal-directed and effortful online engagement with scientific information.
机译:社会目前从气候变化的许多迫切问题从气候变化到全球大流行 - 要求公民,以作为民主社会的成员而与科学信息一起参与,以及解决个人生活中的问题。最常见的是,为了解决他们的认知目标(针对知识和理解的目的,关于此类社会科学问题,个人在线搜索信息,那里存在多种可能的相关和高度相互互连的不同观点来源,有时有时会提供冲突的信息。本文介绍了旨在识别(a)制约的文献和可承受科学知识和在线信息环境的资格,(b)已发现妨碍或相反,支持参与实践的个人认知和动机进程(例如关键信息评估或双面对话)。这样做,介绍了一个概念性框架,用于了解和培养我们通过对科学信息进行在线参与的内容,该框架被认为是由个人参与组成(在搜索,选择,评估和信息的搜索,选择,评估和整合中聘用)和对话的参与(与其他人参与话语来解释,表达和批判性地检查科学信息)。反过来,本文确定了个人目标与科学信息的目标目标和精彩的在线参与的个人和上下文条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号