首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Time Course of Creativity in Dance
【24h】

Time Course of Creativity in Dance

机译:舞蹈创造力的时间

获取原文
       

摘要

Time-motion studies revolutionized the design and efficiency of repetitive work last century. Would time-idea studies revolutionize the rules of intellectual/creative work this century? Collaborating with seven professional dancers, we set out to discover if there were any significant temporal patterns to be found in a timeline coded to show when dancers come up with ideas and when they modify or reject them. On each of 3 days, the dancers were given a choreographic problem (or task) to help them generate a novel, high quality contemporary dance phrase. They were videoed as they worked on this task for sessions of 15, 30, and 45 min. At the end of each 15 min interval during each session, we had them perform the phrase they were creating. They recorded and then coded the video of themselves dancing during these sessions by using a coding language we developed with them to identify when ideas are introduced, modified, and rejected. We found that most ideas are created early and that though these early ideas are aggressively pruned early on, many still make it into the final product. The two competing accounts of creativity in design research make predictions for the temporal structure of creativity. Our results support neither account, rather showing a more blended version of the two. The iterative design view, arguably the dominant view, is that good ideas are the product of generating many ideas, choosing one fairly early, committing to it, and iteratively improving it. The “fail fast fail often” view is that good ideas are the product of rapidly generating and discarding ideas and holding back from early commitment to any one in particular. The result of holding back commitment, typically, is not that an idea is taken up later and then incrementally improved at the last minute, as much as that later designs are not completely novel, instead incorporating the best parts of the entire sequence of ideas. In our study, we found no evidence that one account or the other was more predictive for the domain of contemporary dance. The behavior of the dancers that we studied revealed elements of both, calling into question how predictive these theories are.
机译:时间动作研究彻底改变了上世纪重复工作的设计和效率。时代研究会彻底改变本世纪的知识分子/创造性的工作规则吗?与七个专业舞者合作,我们开始发现如果在编码的时间线上有任何重要的时间模式,以显示舞者何时提出思路以及修改或拒绝它们时。在3天的每一个上,舞者都有一个编排的问题(或任务),以帮助他们产生一部小说,高质量的当代舞蹈短语。他们被录取为这项任务为15,30和45分钟的工作。在每个会话期间每15分钟间隔的结束时,我们都有他们执行他们创建的短语。他们通过使用我们开发的编码语言在这些会话期间编码了自己跳舞的视频,以识别何时介绍,修改和拒绝何时何时介绍。我们发现大多数想法都是早期创造的,虽然这些早期想法正在迅速提前修剪,但许多人仍然可以进入最终产品。设计研究中创造力的两个竞争账户对创造力的时间结构进行了预测。我们的结果既不支持账户,而不是显示两者更混合的版本。迭代设计视图可以说是主导的观点,是良好的想法是产生许多想法的产品,选择一个相当早,致力于它,并迭代地改善它。 “失败快速失败经常”观点是,良好的想法是迅速产生和丢弃想法的产品,并特别从早期承诺。持有备份承诺的结果通常不是一个想法是在稍后拍摄的,然后在最后一分钟逐步改善,因为稍后的设计并不完全是新颖的,而是整个思想序列的最佳部分。在我们的研究中,我们发现没有证据表明一个账户或另一个账户对当代舞蹈领域更加预测。我们研究过的舞者的行为揭示了两者的要素,呼吁质疑这些理论是多么预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号