首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >Relative Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Relative Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

机译:糖尿病外周神经病变的药物治疗性干预的相对疗效和安全性:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a most common devitalizing complication of diabetes mellitus, which is primarily characterized by sensory loss, paresthesia, prickling, pain, or allodynia. Objectives: To evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of the interventions used in the DPN pain management and rank their order. Study Design: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: Randomized, controlled trials were identified through a comprehensive, systematic literature exploration, primarily utilizing the PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, and Cochrane Library databases. The efficacy and safety outcomes consist of the proportion of patients reporting either 30% or 50% pain reduction and overall withdrawal or withdrawal due to adverse drug events, respectively. Effect estimates from Bayesian NMA were presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Heterogeneity and convergence were assessed by using I2 and deviation information criteria. The risk of bias was evaluated by using Pedro Scale. Results: A total of 3,246 potentially relevant trials were identified and screened, finally 43 trials consisting of 7,877 randomized patients met the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant treatment difference for 50% pain reduction was reported for duloxetine vs. placebo (OR: 2.50; CrI: 1.62-3.91), mirogabalin vs. placebo (OR: 3.25; CrI: 1.16-9.35), pregabalin vs. placebo (OR: 2.33; CrI: 1.69-3.27), duloxetine vs. carbamazepine (OR: 3.37; CrI: 1.07-10.90), mirogabalin vs. carbamazepine (OR: 4.39; CrI: 1.01-19.63), mirogabalin vs. lamotrigine (OR: 4.05: CrI: 1.07-15.77), pregabalin vs. lamotrigine (OR: 2.90, CrI: 1.19-7.22) and pregabalin vs. nortriptyline (OR: 4.10, CrI: 1.13-5.28). Nortriptyline reported the highest possibility of achieving 30% and 50% pain reduction. Sodium valproate and benztropine reported the highest probability of total withdrawals and withdrawals due to adverse drug events, respectively. Limitation: The different follow-up time of the included studies can result in the variation of intended results. Conclusion: Nortriptyline reported the advantage relative to other drugs in achieving 30% and 50% pain reduction from the baseline. Gabapentin reported a significance of 50% pain reduction relative to placebo.
机译:糖尿病外周神经病变(DPN)是一种最常见的糖尿病的活力,其主要是表征感觉丧失,感觉损失,刺痛,疼痛或异常性。目标:评估DPN疼痛管理中使用的干预措施的相对功效和安全性,并进行排序。研究设计:系统评价和贝叶斯网络元分析(NMA)。方法:通过全面,系统的文献勘探确定随机,受控试验,主要利用PubMed,Embase,Ovid和Cochrane图书馆数据库。疗效和安全结果分别由报告患者的比例报告疼痛减少30%或50%,疼痛疼痛的疼痛和总戒烟或戒断因子因不良药物而言。贝叶斯NMA的效果估计被呈现为具有95%可靠间隔(CRI)的差距比(或)。通过使用I2和偏差信息标准评估异质性和收敛性。使用佩德罗级评估偏差的风险。结果:鉴定和筛查共有3,246项潜在的相关试验,最后43名由7,877名随机患者组成的试验达到纳入标准。据报道,Duloxetine对安慰剂(或:2.50; CRI:1.62-3.91),Mirogabalin与安慰剂(或:3.25; CRI:1.16-9.35),Praetabalin与安慰剂(或)的50%疼痛减少的统计学差异:2.33; CRI:1.69-3.27),Duloxetine与卡马西汀(或:3.37; CRI:1.07-10.90),Mirogabalin与尸体植物(或:4.39; CRI:1.01-19.63),Mirogabalin与甲羟氢(或:4.05 :CRI:1.07-15.77),Pragabalin与拉莫里林(或:2.90,CRI:1.19-7.22)和Pragabalin与Nortriptyline(或:4.10,CRI:1.13-5.28)。 Nortriptyline报告了实现减少30%和50%疼痛的最高可能性。戊酸钠和苯并丙烯酸钠分别报告了由于不良药物事件的总提取和戒烟的概率最高。限制:所包含的研究的不同随访时间可能导致预期结果的变化。结论:Nortriptyline报告了与其他药物相对于达到基线减少30%和50%疼痛的优势。加巴亨顿报道了相对于安慰剂减少50%的疼痛减少的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号