首页> 外文期刊>Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology >Virtuality and subjective realities: A freedom-based ergon for the modern African parent
【24h】

Virtuality and subjective realities: A freedom-based ergon for the modern African parent

机译:虚拟性和主观现实:以现代非洲父母为基础的自由纪念品

获取原文
       

摘要

Schmidt introduces the Aristotelian term “koinonia” as denoting a political community which aims to achieve a common good for society as a whole. A good that promotes the flourishing of every party involved. In addition, Schmidt adopts further insight about the term by engaging more thoroughly in discourse about it, realising that this easily extends to the term taking on tenets of communities such as a family. Within family, the terms address even more specific relationships, such as husband and wife, parents and children, sibling relationships, etc. Essentially, Aristotle’s premise of common good persists even in these specific relationships, so much so that Schmidt highlights the pillars which sustain the pursuit of the common good. These pillars are justice, fairness and reciprocity, all grounded in good will and fellowship. This goodwill and fellowship among African parents in a community is to assist each other in raising children in the community and ensure they are grounded in African values, hence the African proverb “a single hand cannot raise a child”. In fact, biological parents may draw from the knowledge of the elderly in the community who can assist in instilling values in the youth. The importance of this is that the elderly in African communities are valued not only as those who sustain order in the community, but are also the custodians of African value systems which younger generations should ideally be grounded in. With the introduction of technology, the digital divide seems to be presenting a challenge when it comes to the solidarity of African parents, as a village, raising their children. Hence, a strategy is required for modern African parents to not abandon this solidarity afforded by their cultural values. The communal way of raising their children should persist in order to preserve the African value of parental solidarity in raising children, even in the midst of what technology and the digital divide presents to the African community.
机译:Schmidt介绍了亚里士多特术语“Koinonia”,表示一个政治界,旨在为整体实现社会的共同利益。促进每个涉及的各方蓬勃发展的善良。此外,施密特通过更彻底地参与其中的话语,通过更彻底地参与其中的术语,实现这一目标容易延伸到诸如家庭等社区的术语。在家庭中,术语涉及更具体的关系,如丈夫和妻子,父母和孩子,兄弟姐妹和孩子,兄弟姐妹的关系。基本上,即使在这些具体的关系中,亚里士多德仍然存在共同的良好持续存在,因此施密特突出了维持的柱子追求共同的好处。这些支柱是正义,公平和互惠性,所有人都以良好的意愿和团契为基础。这种社区中非洲父母的善意和奖学金是互相协助在社区中提高儿童,并确保他们在非洲价值观的基础上,因此非洲谚语“一只手不能抚养孩子”。事实上,生物父母可能会从社区中的老年人的知识中吸取,他们可以帮助灌输青年中的价值观。这是重要的是,非洲社区的老人不仅受到社会秩序的那些,而且也是年轻几代人应该理想地接受的非洲价值制度的监护人。随着技术的引入,数字除了涉及非洲父母的团结,作为一个村庄,追求他们的孩子们的挑战似乎是挑战。因此,现代非洲父母不需要通过他们的文化价值提供这种团结所需的战略。抚养子女的公共方式应坚持,以保护父母团结在抚养儿童的父母团结的非洲价值,即使在非洲社区的技术和数字鸿沟中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号