首页> 外文期刊>Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology >On the possible phenomenological autonomy of virtual realities
【24h】

On the possible phenomenological autonomy of virtual realities

机译:论虚拟现实的可能现象学自主权

获取原文
       

摘要

In the following article, I examine Martin Heidegger’s philosophy of dwelling with a view to its importance for the concept of ‘place’. It is my interest to show how a phenomenological concept of place can elucidate the phenomenology of virtual reality. I begin by contextualising the investigation through a presentation of Jeff Malpas’ concept of the non-autonomy of the virtual, and argue for a clearer understanding of the notion of causal non-autonomy. Furthermore, I argue that the autonomy or lack thereof of virtual reality should not lead to the conclusion that virtual reality cannot be experienced and examined as a self-standing entity; that in order to properly understand virtual reality, we cannot limit ourselves to the reductionistic view presented by Malpas, but must account also for the phenomenology of experiencing virtuality – and under such a phenomenological consideration, the distinctions made between non-virtual and virtual reality are made more diffuse. I then argue that we can plausibly accept that places may exist in virtual reality, despite current technological and practical limitations. In addition, I go on to consider some possible metaphysical differences between virtual and non-virtual places.
机译:在以下文章中,我研究了马丁海德格尔的住宅哲学,以期对“地方”概念的重要性。我有兴趣展示出现的地方的现象学概念如何阐明虚拟现实的现象学。我首先通过介绍杰夫马尔帕斯的非自治概念的调查,并争辩说清楚地了解因果非自治的概念。此外,我认为虚拟现实的自主或缺乏不应导致结论,虚拟现实不能经历并被检查为自我站立实体;这是为了正确理解虚拟现实,我们无法将自己限制在马尔巴斯呈现的减速视图中,但必须考虑到体验虚拟性的现象学 - 在这种现象学考虑中,在非虚拟和虚拟现实之间的区别是变得更加弥漫。我争辩说,尽管现有的技术和实际限制,我们可以合理地接受这种地方可能存在于虚拟现实中。此外,我继续考虑虚拟和非虚拟地方之间的一些可能的形而上学差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号