首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Attachment and Concord of Temporal Adverbs: Evidence From Eye Movements
【24h】

Attachment and Concord of Temporal Adverbs: Evidence From Eye Movements

机译:颞副词的附件和康科:来自眼球运动的证据

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The present study examined the processing of temporal adverbial phrases such as “last week”, which must agree in temporal features with the verb they modify. We investigated readers’ sensitivity to this feature match or mismatch in two eye-tracking studies. The main aim of this study was to expand the range of concord phenomena which have been investigated in real-time processing in order to understand how linguistic dependencies are formed during sentence comprehension (Felser et al. 2017). Under a cue-based perspective, linguistic dependency formation relies on an associative cue-based retrieval mechanism (Lewis et al., 2006; McElree, 2006), but how such a mechanism is deployed over diverse linguistic dependencies remains a matter of debate. Are all linguistic features candidate cues that guide retrieval? Are all cues given similar weight? Are different cues differently weighted based on the dependency being processed? To address these questions, we implemented a mismatch paradigm (Sturt, 2003) adapted for temporal concord dependencies. This paradigm tested whether readers were sensitive to a temporal agreement between a temporal adverb like last week and a linearly distant, but structurally accessible verb, as well as a linearly proximate but structurally inaccessible verb. We found clear evidence that readers were sensitive to feature match between the adverb and the linearly distant, structurally accessible verb. We found no clear evidence on whether feature match with the inaccessible verb impacted the processing of a temporal adverb. Our results suggest syntactic positional information plays an important role during the processing of the temporal concord relation.
机译:本研究检测了诸如“上周”之类的时间状语短语的处理,其必须与他们修改的动词相加。我们调查了读者对这一特征匹配的敏感性或在两个眼睛跟踪研究中的不匹配。本研究的主要目的是扩大已经在实时处理中调查的康科德现象的范围,以了解在句子理解期间如何形成语言依赖性(Felser等,2017)。在一个基于CUE的角度来看,语言依赖性形成依赖于基于联想的CUE的检索机制(Lewis等,2006; McElree,2006),但是如何在不同的语言依赖下部署这样的机制仍然是辩论问题。所有语言都是指导检索的候选提示吗?所有提示都给出了类似的重量吗?基于正在处理的依赖性的不同的线索是不同的加权吗?为了解决这些问题,我们实施了适用于时间官方官方依赖性的不匹配范例(Sturt,2003)。此范例测试了读者是否对上周的时间副词和线性遥远但结构上可访问的动词以及线性邻近但结构性地无法访问的动词进行敏感。我们发现明确的证据表明读者对副词和线性遥远,结构可访问的动词之间的特征匹配敏感。我们发现没有关于功能匹配是否与无法访问的动词影响的清晰证据影响了时间副词的处理。我们的结果表明句法位置信息在处理时间康复关系期间发挥着重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号