首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean medical science. >Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors, Reviewers and Editors
【24h】

Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors, Reviewers and Editors

机译:学术期刊提交中的相似性和抄袭:为作者,审稿人和编辑的概念带来清晰度

获取原文
       

摘要

hat constitutes plagiarism? What are the methods to detect plagiarism? How do “plagiarism detection tools” assist in detecting plagiarism? What is the difference between plagiarism and similarity index? These are probably the most common questions regarding plagiarism that many research experts in scientific writing are usually faced with, but a definitive answer to them is less known to many. According to a report published in 2018, papers retracted for plagiarism have sharply increased over the last two decades, with higher rates in developing and non-English speaking countries.1 Several studies have reported similar findings with Iran, China, India, Japan, Korea, Italy, Romania, Turkey, and France amongst the countries with highest number of retractions due to plagiarism.1-4 A study reported that duplication of text, figures or tables without appropriate referencing accounted for 41.3% of post-2009 retractions of papers published from India.5 In Pakistan, Journal of Pakistan Medical Association started a special section titled “Learning Research” and published a couple of papers on research writing skills, research integrity and scientific misconduct.6,7 However, the problem has not been adequately addressed and specific issues about it remain unresolved and unclear. According to an unpublished data based on 1,679 students from four universities of Pakistan, 85.5% did not have a clear understanding of the difference between similarity index and plagiarism (unpublished data). Smart et al.8 in their global survey of editors reported that around 63% experienced some plagiarized submissions, with Asian editors experiencing the highest levels of plagiarized/duplicated content. In some papers, journals from non-English speaking countries have specifically discussed the cases of plagiarized submissions to them and have highlighted the drawbacks in relying on similarity checking programs.9-11 The cases of plagiarism in non-English speaking countries have a strong message for honest researchers that they should improve their English writing skills and credit used sources by properly citing and referencing them.
机译:帽子构成剽窃?检测抄袭的方法是什么? “抄袭检测工具”如何协助检测抄袭?抄袭和相似性指数有什么区别?这些可能是有关抄袭的最常见问题,即科学写作的许多研究专家通常面临,但对他们的最终答案是较少的。据2018年发表的一份报告称,在过去二十年中撤回抄袭的论文大幅增加,发展中国家和非英语国家的速度提高了.1若干研究报告了与伊朗,中国,印度,日本,韩国类似的研究。 ,意大利,罗马尼亚,土耳其和法国在抄袭导致最多次数的国家中.1-4研究报告说,没有适当参考的未经适当的参考额重复文本,数字或表格,占2009篇论文邮政职位的41.3%来自印度的巴基斯坦,巴基斯坦医学会杂志开始了一个标题为“学习研究”的特殊部分,并在研究写作技巧,研究完整性和科学的不当上发表了几篇论文.6,7然而,问题尚未充分解决问题关于它的具体问题仍未解决,不清楚。根据基于1,679名从巴基斯坦大学的1,679名学生的未发表的数据,85.5%没有明确了解相似性指数和抄袭之间的差异(未发表的数据)。 Smart等人在他们对编辑全球调查中报告称,大约63%的人经历了一些抄袭提交的抄袭,亚洲编辑经历了最高水平的抄袭/重复内容。在一些论文中,来自非英语国家的期刊专门讨论了对他们的抄袭提交的案件,并强调了依托相似性检查计划的弊端.9-11非英语国家的抄袭案件有一个强大的信息对于诚实的研究人员,他们应该通过适当引用和引用它们来改善他们的英语写作技巧和信用来源。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号