首页> 外文期刊>H-ermes. Journal of Communication >Immaginario o immaginari? Europa e America a confronto. Due casi: il ritorno dell'eroe e la figura del Supereroe = Imagination or imaginations? Europe and America in comparison. Two cases: the return of the hero and the Superhero figure
【24h】

Immaginario o immaginari? Europa e America a confronto. Due casi: il ritorno dell'eroe e la figura del Supereroe = Imagination or imaginations? Europe and America in comparison. Two cases: the return of the hero and the Superhero figure

机译:虚构或虚构?欧美比较。两种情况:返回英雄和超级英雄的人物=想象力或想象力吗?欧美相比。两种情况:英雄回归和超级英雄数字

获取原文
       

摘要

Over the recent years, the exploration of the notion of 'social imagination' has been carried out by searching for the essence, for that archetypal collective deposits that are positioned along a line that goes from Jung to Bachelard to Durand. As a result, research has usually relied on the idea of a universal "imagination", which derives from disciplines such as – among others – psychology, anthropology, and neuroscience. And yet, due to the development of these studies, scholars have discussed the sociologists' task, questioning whether they have to search for the essential core of the symbolic system or to identify the particular historical and cultural meaning that this absolute system takes on from time to time. This paper intends to inspect the appropriateness of talking about the study of the "imaginations" rather than that of the "imagination". At first, we illustrate the causes of the historical-geographical differentiation of imaginaries. Then, we enquire into the role of the ideological structure and of the social, spatial, religious and economic contexts as preconditions for the construction of different and therefore specific archetypes. The investigation is performed by considering the American imagination system in contrast to the Catholic-European one. In particular, two main factors are taken into account: the re-functionalisation of Lotman's archetypal structure, i.e., the relationship between the space of consciousness and the outer space, which is expressed in the myth of the hero's return home; and the re-functionalisation of the archetype of the hero in the conception of the American superhero.
机译:近年来,通过寻求本质,对“社会想象力”的概念探讨,因为该本质,沿着从Jung到Bachlard到Durand的线路定位的原型集体存款。因此,研究通常依赖于普遍的“想象力”的想法,这些想法来自其他 - 与其他人之间的学科 - 心理学,人类学和神经科学。然而,由于这些研究的发展,学者们已经讨论了社会学家的任务,质疑他们是否必须寻找符号系统的基本核心,或者确定这种绝对系统从时所占据的特殊历史和文化意义时间。本文打算检查谈论对“想象力”的研究而不是“想象力”的研究的适当性。起初,我们说明了富翁历史地理分化的原因。然后,我们询问思想政治结构的作用,以及社会,空间,宗教和经济背景作为建造不同的和因此特定原型的先决条件。通过将美国想象力系统与天主教 - 欧洲人相比,调查是通过考虑的。特别是,考虑了两个主要因素:Lotman的原型结构的重新函数,即意识的空间与外层空间之间的关系,在英雄回归的神话中表达;和美国超级英雄概念中英雄原型的重新函数。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号