首页> 外文期刊>Patient Preference and Adherence >Veterans Perceptions of Satisfaction and Convenience with Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation: Warfarin versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants
【24h】

Veterans Perceptions of Satisfaction and Convenience with Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation: Warfarin versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants

机译:退伍军人对心房颤动的抗凝血剂对满足和便利性的看法:华法林与直接口服抗凝剂

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, AFib was treated with warfarin, yet recent evidence suggests patients may favor direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Variation in preferences is common and we explored patients’ perceptions of satisfaction and convenience of DOACs versus warfarin within the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Patients and Methods: We administered a cross-sectional survey, the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2), to Veterans residing in New England, age ≥ 65, diagnosed with AFib, and actively taking anticoagulant medication in fiscal year 2018. Survey recipients were randomly selected among patients on warfarin (n=200) or DOACs (n=200). A selection of survey respondents agreed to a follow-up semi-structured interview (n=16) to further investigate perceptions of satisfaction and convenience. Results: Of 400 patients, 187 completed the PACT-Q2 survey (49% on DOACs; 51% on warfarin). DOACs received significantly higher convenience ratings than warfarin (87.6, SD 13.5 vs 81.1, SD 18.8; p=0.007); there was no difference in satisfaction (64.2, SD 20.5 SD, warfarin vs, 67.3, SD 19.4, DOACs). Interview results showed that participants perceived their treatment to be convenient. However, participants expressed challenges related to the convenience of taking warfarin or DOACs, such as warfarin users having to follow dietary recommendations or DOAC users desiring some additional monitoring to answer questions or concerns. Overall, warfarin and DOAC users reported satisfaction with ongoing monitoring methods, although a few DOAC users expressed uncertainties with the frequency of monitoring. For most participants, concerns about side effects did not differ by anticoagulant type nor affect satisfaction. Conclusion: Our survey and interview results showed variable patient satisfaction and perceptions of convenience with both DOACs and warfarin. Although DOACs are increasingly prescribed for AFib, some Veterans felt that regular follow-up on warfarin was advantageous. Our findings demonstrate the importance of patient-centered decision-making in AFib treatment in the VA patient population.
机译:背景:心房颤动(AFIB)与高发病率和死亡率有关。传统上,Afib用华法林治疗,然而最近的证据表明患者可能有利于直接口服抗凝血剂(Doacs)。偏好的变异是常见的,我们探讨了患者对退伍军人健康管理局(VA)内Doacs对Doacs的满意度和便利性的看法。患者和方法:我们管理了横断面调查,对遭受侵入新英格兰的退伍军人的横截面调查,抗凝血治疗问卷2(PACT-Q2),年龄≥65岁,诊断为AFIB,并在2018财年积极服用抗凝血药物。调查受试者随机选择华法林(N = 200)或DOAC的患者(n = 200)。一系列调查受访者同意进行后续半结构化访谈(n = 16),以进一步调查对满足和便利性的看法。结果:400例患者,187例完成了PACT-Q2调查(DOACs 49%;华法林51%)。 Doacs比华法林(87.6,SD 13.5 VS 81.1,SD 18.8; P = 0.007)收到明显较高的便利额定值。满意度没有差异(64.2,SD 20.5 SD,Warfarin VS,67.3,SD 19.4,Doacs)。采访结果表明,参与者认为他们的待遇是方便的。然而,与会者表达了与服用Warfarin或Doacs的便利性有关的挑战,例如华法林用户不得不遵循饮食建议或Doac用户希望一些额外的监测来回答问题或疑虑。总体而言,华法林和Doac用户报告了持续监测方法的满意度,尽管几个DOAC用户表达了监测频率的不确定性。对于大多数参与者而言,对副作用的担忧没有抗癌类型的差异,也不会影响满足感。结论:我们的调查和面试结果显示了患者满意度和对Doacs和Warfarin方便的看法。虽然Doacs越来越多地为AFIB规定,但一些退伍军人认为,在华法林的定期随访是有利的。我们的调查结果表明,患者中心决策在VA患者人口中的AFIB治疗中的重要性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号