首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nutrition and metabolism >Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Increase the Sensitivity of Screening Methods for Diagnosing Cancer Cachexia in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
【24h】

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Increase the Sensitivity of Screening Methods for Diagnosing Cancer Cachexia in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

机译:生物电阻抗分析,提高结直肠癌患者诊断癌症患者诊断方法的敏感性

获取原文
       

摘要

Background. Currently used methods for detecting and monitoring cancer cachexia (CC) are not sensitive enough. In this field, there is a need to implement new instruments into clinical practice. Objective. Determining the usefulness of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for detecting and monitoring CC in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods. 158 people were invited to the study (70 from CRC and 88 controls). Their body composition was determined using BIA, and their nutritional status was determined according to NRS 2002, SGA, and BMI criteria. For statistical data analysis, Student’s t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and AUC ROC were used. Results. Men with CRC stage I had higher values of FMI, SMMI, and ECW/TBW (p0.05) than in stages II–IV, and women with CRC stage I had higher values of FMI, FFMI, and FM/FFM than in the group of stages II–IV (p0.05). The ability of FFMI to detect malnutrition relative to SGA was low (sensitivity: women 40%, men 40% and specificity: women 74%, men 70%). Conclusions. SGA and NRS 2002 scales are dynamic and consider changes in nutritional status over time, while BIA is static and does not consider these changes. Therefore, BIA is not a good tool for screening nutritional status. BIA successfully identifies differences in body composition depending on cancer stage and advancement of CC. Therefore, after the diagnosis CRC, just to monitor the disease advancement and state of CC, it is worth comparing the results of periodically repeated BIA.
机译:背景。目前使用用于检测和监测癌症恶化的方法(CC)的方法不够敏感。在这一领域,需要将新仪器实施到临床实践中。客观的。确定与结直肠癌(CRC)患者检测和监测CC检测和监测CC的生物电阻抗分析(BIA)的用途。方法。邀请158人参加研究(来自CRC和88个控件70人)。使用BIA测定它们的身体组成,并根据NRS 2002,SGA和BMI标准确定它们的营养状况。对于统计数据分析,使用学生的T-Test,Mann-Whitney U测试和AUC ROC。结果。具有CRC阶段的男性,我的FMI,SMMI和ECW / TBW(P <0.05)具有比阶段II-IV的更高价值,以及CRC阶段的女性,我的FMI,FFMI和FM / FFM的价值观比在阶段II-IV组(P <0.05)。 FFMI检测相对于SGA的营养不良的能力低(敏感性:女性40%,男性40%和特异性:女性74%,男性70%)。结论。 SGA和NRS 2002尺度是动态的,并考虑随时间的营养状况的变化,而BIA是静态的,并且不考虑这些变化。因此,BIA不是筛选营养状况的良好工具。 BIA成功地根据CC的癌症阶段和推进来识别身体组成的差异。因此,在诊断CRC之后,只是为了监测CC的疾病进步和状态,值得比较定期重复BIA的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号