首页> 外文期刊>Physical Review Physics Education Research >Pedagogical sensemaking or a€?doing schoola€?: In well-designed workshop sessions, facilitation makes the difference
【24h】

Pedagogical sensemaking or a€?doing schoola€?: In well-designed workshop sessions, facilitation makes the difference

机译:教学意识运动或者?在设计精心设计的车间欧元时,促进会产生差异

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Although physics education researchers often use workshops to promote instructional change in higher education, little research has been done to investigate workshop design. Initial evidence suggests that many workshop sessions focus primarily on raising facultya€?s awareness of research-based instructional strategies, a fairly straightforward goal that has been largely met. However, increasing facultya€?s awareness of existing strategies alone has somewhat limited benefits. We argue that workshop leaders should also aim to cultivate facultya€?s ability and motivation to engage in pedagogical sensemaking, i.e., the pursuit of robust pedagogical logic based on observations and interpretations of classroom events. This goal is likely more challenging to achieve, and thus presents a greater need for research. In this paper, we pursue in??situ, qualitative analysis of two parallel workshop sessions that seem to have the potential to support ambitious outcomes. We demonstrate how faculty may engage in aspects of pedagogical sensemaking, such as using observations of student behavior to support their arguments. We also show how faculty may instead seem to engage in interactions reminiscent of students a€?doing school,a€? such as evaluating instruction based on a€?correctnessa€? alone. We also show how differences in workshop facilitation seemed to contribute to faculty engaging in pedagogical sensemaking in one session only. These differences include (i)??strictly enforcing session rules versus gently navigating facultya€?s incoming expectations, (ii)??highlighting the workshop leadersa€? expertise versus working to minimize power differentials, and (iii)??emphasizing the benefits of adoption of a prescribed strategy versus encouraging faculty to reason about possible adaptations. We consider the implications of this analysis for future research and workshop design.
机译:虽然物理教育研究人员经常使用研讨会来促进高等教育的教学变革,但研究了研究车间设计。初步证据表明,许多研讨会会议主要集中在提高学校的教学教学战略意识,这是一个很大程度上达到的目标。然而,越来越多的学员们对现有策略的认识仅有一些有限的福利。我们认为研讨会领导人还应该旨在培养学员的能力和动力,以涉及教学意愿,即基于对课堂事件的观察和解释的强有力的教学逻辑。这一目标可能更具挑战性,从而提高了对研究的需求。在本文中,我们追求在原位,对两个平行车间会议的定性分析,这些课程似乎有可能支持雄心勃勃的结果。我们展示了教师如何参与教学意愿的方面,例如使用学生行为的观察来支持他们的论点。我们还展示了教师如何让人在一起让人想起学生的互动(欧元)?做学校,一个€?如评估基于€的指令?正确性€?独自的。我们还展示了讲习班促进的差异似乎是有助于在一个会议中参与教学意识的教师。这些差异包括(i)严格执行会议规则与轻轻导航学员的来源,(ii)??突出讲习班领导€€?专业知识与努力最大限度地减少电源差异,并强调通过规定的战略的利益与鼓励教师有关可能的调整。我们考虑该分析对未来研究和研讨会设计的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号