首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Self-reported data in environmental health studies: mail vs. web-based surveys
【24h】

Self-reported data in environmental health studies: mail vs. web-based surveys

机译:环境健康研究中的自我报告数据:邮件与基于Web的调查

获取原文
       

摘要

Internet has been broadly employed as a facilitator for epidemiological surveys, as a way to provide a more economical and practical alternative to traditional survey modes. A current trend in survey research is to combine Web-based surveys with other survey modes by offering the participant the possibility of choosing his/her preferred response method (i.e. mixed-mode approach). However, studies have also demonstrated that the use of different survey modes may produce different responses to the same questions, posing potential challenges on the use of mixed-mode approaches. In this paper, we have implemented a statistical comparison between mixed-mode survey responses collected via mail (i.e. paper) and Web methods obtained from a cross-sectional study in non-urban areas of Denmark. Responses provided by mail and Web participants were compared in terms of: 1) the impact of reminder letters in increasing response rates; 2) differences in socio-demographic characteristics between response groups; 3) changes on the likelihood of reporting health symptoms and negative attitudes towards environmental stressors. Comparisons were mainly performed by two sample t-test, Pearson’s Chi-squared test and multinomial logistic regression models. Among 3104 contacted households, 1066 residents decided to participate on the study. Out of those, 971 selected to respond via mail, whereas 275 preferred the Web method. The majority of socio-demographic characteristics between these two groups of respondents were shown to be statistically different. The use of mailed surveys increased the likelihood of reporting health symptoms and negative attitudes towards environmental stressors, even after controlling for demographic characteristics. Furthermore, the use of reminder letters had a higher positive impact in increasing responses of Web surveys when compared to mail surveys. Our main findings suggest that the use of mail and Web surveys may produce different responses to the same questions posed to participants, but, at the same time, may reach different groups of respondents, given that the overall characteristics of both groups considerably differ. Therefore, the tradeoff between using mixed-mode survey as a way to increase response rate and obtaining undesirable measurement changes may be attentively considered in future survey studies.
机译:互联网已广泛聘用作为流行病学调查的促进者,作为为传统调查模式提供更经济和实用的替代品的一种促进者。调查研究的目前趋势是通过提供参与者选择他/她的首选响应方法(即混合模式方法)的可能性来将基于网络的调查与其他调查模式相结合。然而,研究还表明,使用不同的调查模式可能对同一问题产生不同的反应,对混合模式方法的使用构成潜在的挑战。在本文中,我们已经实施了通过邮件(即纸张)和从丹麦非城市地区的横截面研究中获得的横截面研究获得的混合模式调查响应之间的统计比较。邮件和网络参与者提供的答复在以下方面进行了比较:1)提醒信件对额外反应率的影响; 2)响应组之间的社会人口统计特征的差异; 3)关于报告健康症状和对环境压力态度的负面态度的可能性的变化。比较主要是由两个样本T检验,Pearson的Chi Squared测试和多项逻辑回归模型进行。在3104个联系人中,1066名居民决定参加该研究。在其中,971选择通过邮件进行响应,而275首选Web方法。这两组受访者之间的大多数社会人口统计学特征被证明是统计学不同的。即使在控制人口特征后,使用邮寄调查的使用增加了报告健康症状和对环境压力态度的负面态度的可能性。此外,与邮件调查相比,使用提醒信的使用对Web调查的响应具有更高的积极影响。我们的主要研究结果表明,邮件和网络调查的使用可能会对与参与者提出的同一问题产生不同的回应,但同时可以达到不同的受访者组,因为这两组的整体特征显着不同。因此,在未来的调查研究中,使用混合模式调查作为增加响应率和获得不良测量变化的方式之间的权衡可能会被术语考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号