首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Frequency and Type of Hedging Devices Used in the Research Articles of Humanities, Basic Sciences and Agriculture
【24h】

Frequency and Type of Hedging Devices Used in the Research Articles of Humanities, Basic Sciences and Agriculture

机译:人文,基础科学和农业研究论文中使用的套期保值工具的频率和类型

获取原文
       

摘要

The present study compared and contrasted the frequency of use of hedging devices used in the research articles of three fields of Humanities, Basic Sciences and Agriculture and three sub-fields within each field (i.e. Law, Persian literature and TEFL within Humanities; Biotechnology, Soil Sciences and Horticulture within Agriculture; and Biology, Applied Chemistry and Geology within Basic Sciences). In so doing, 180 research articles, 20 from each sub-field, were selected and analyzed based on Salager- Meyer's (1994) taxonomy of hedging. The results of the chi-square analyses revealed, regarding the frequency of use and type of hedging devices, there were significant differences among: a) the three fields of Humanities, Basic Sciences and Agriculture; b) the sub-fields of Humanities, Basic Sciences and Agriculture.
机译:本研究比较并对比了人文,基础科学和农业这三个领域以及每个领域内的三个子领域(即法律,波斯文学和人文科学领域的TEFL;生物技术,土壤)研究文章中使用的套期保值工具的使用频率。农业领域的科学和园艺;以及基础科学领域的生物学,应用化学和地质)。这样,根据Salager-Meyer(1994)的套期分类法,选择并分析了180个研究文章,每个子领域20个。卡方分析的结果表明,在使用频率和对冲工具的类型方面,存在以下显着差异:a)人文,基础科学和农业这三个领域; b)人文,基础科学和农业子领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号