首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Combined Training of One Cognitive and One Metacognitive Strategy Improves Academic Writing Skills
【24h】

Combined Training of One Cognitive and One Metacognitive Strategy Improves Academic Writing Skills

机译:一种认知和一种元认知策略的联合训练可提高学术写作技能

获取原文
       

摘要

Academic writing is a challenging task. Expert writers apply various writing skills as they anticipate the reader’s view of their text while paying attention to structure and content. Research in the high school setting shows that the acquisition of writing skills can be supported by single-strategy training. However, research in higher education is scarce. We tested whether the development of academic writing skills can also be effectively supported by training single strategies or even combined strategies. As metacognition is an important skill for advanced and adult learners, we focused in this study on the benefit of combined cognitive strategies with and without a metacognitive strategy. An experiment including three conditions was conducted (N = 60 German-speaking psychology undergraduates, M = 22.8, SD = 4.4), which lasted for three hours. Each group received a modeling intervention of a basic cognitive strategy on the application of text structure knowledge. Two groups received an additional modeling intervention with either a cognitive strategy treatment on text summarization or a metacognitive strategy treatment on self-monitoring the writing process. One group received no further strategy treatment. Prior knowledge and learning outcomes were measured with a specially developed test on academic writing skills. In addition, all participants wrote an abstract of an empirical article. We found that learners who received the additional self-monitoring strategy intervention benefited significantly more in terms of acquisition of academic writing skills and the quality of their texts than learners who did not receive this intervention. Thus, the results underline the importance of self-monitoring strategies in academic writing. Implications and further research opportunities are discussed.
机译:学术写作是一项艰巨的任务。专家作家在预期读者对文本的看法的同时,还要注意结构和内容,从而运用各种写作技巧。高中阶段的研究表明,单策略培训可以支持写作技能的培养。但是,对高​​等教育的研究很少。我们测试了通过训练单一策略甚至是组合策略是否也可以有效地支持学术写作技能的发展。由于元认知是高级和成人学习者的一项重要技能,因此我们在本研究中重点研究了有无元认知策略的联合认知策略的益处。进行了包括三个条件的实验(N = 60名说德语的心理学本科生,M = 22.8,SD = 4.4),该实验持续了三个小时。每个小组接受有关文本结构知识应用的基本认知策略的建模干预。两个小组接受了额外的建模干预,其中包括文本摘要的认知策略治疗或自我监控写作过程的元认知策略治疗。一组未接受进一步的策略治疗。通过专门开发的学术写作技能测验来评估先前的知识和学习成果。此外,所有参与者都写了一篇经验文章的摘要。我们发现,接受其他自我监控策略干预的学习者在学习学术写作技能和课文质量方面比未接受干预的学习者受益更多。因此,结果强调了自我监控策略在学术写作中的重要性。涵义和进一步的研究机会进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号