首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Cancer >Clinical trials in cancer: the role of surrogate patients in defining what constitutes an ethically acceptable clinical experiment
【24h】

Clinical trials in cancer: the role of surrogate patients in defining what constitutes an ethically acceptable clinical experiment

机译:癌症临床试验:替代患者在定义什么构成伦理上可接受的临床试验中的作用

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Doctors who treat lung cancer in Ontario were previously asked how they would wish to be managed if they developed non-small cell lung cancer and whether they would consent to participate in six clinical trials for which they might be eligible. The proportion of these expert surrogate patients who would consent to each clinical trial ranged from 11 to 64%. The results of this study were transmitted to the same group of doctors who were asked to comment on the ethical acceptability of each trial in the light of this information. The majority of physicians said that those trials to which less than 50% of expert surrogates consented should not have been opened to patients. Sixty-nine per cent of doctors thought that new trials should be evaluated in this way. We also present the results of a survey of 400 lay people in Ontario who were asked to imagine that they had lung cancer and whether they would consent to participate in two of these same clinical trials. Fifty per cent of lay people consented to a randomised trial of lobectomy versus segmentectomy in early, operable disease (LCSC-821) compared to 64% of expert surrogates, and 48% of lay people consented to a randomised trial of five different forms of chemotherapy in metastatic disease (SWOG-8241) compared to 19% of doctors. It was concluded that the lay people were unable to discern differences in the acceptability of clinical trials which were clear to experts in the field. Subsequently, respondents were told about the decisions which doctors would make in the same circumstances and asked if this information would modify their previous decisions. There is no net change in the proportion of patients consenting to the surgery trial but the proportion of people consenting to the chemotherapy trial decreased by 40%. The majority of lay people said that they would wish to have access to this type of information before consenting to participate in a clinical trial.
机译:先前曾询问在安大略省治疗肺癌的医生,如果他们发展出非小细胞肺癌,希望如何进行治疗,是否同意参加可能符合条件的六项临床试验。这些愿意接受每次临床试验的专家替代患者的比例为11%至64%。这项研究的结果被转交给同一组医生,他们被要求根据这些信息对每个试验的伦理可接受性发表评论。大多数医师表示,不应接受少于50%的专家代理人同意的那些试验。 69%的医生认为应该以这种方式评估新的试验。我们还提供了对安大略省400名非专业人士的调查结果,他们被要求想象自己患有肺癌,以及是否同意参加其中两个相同的临床试验。相对于64%的专家替代品,有50%的非专业人员同意在早期可手术疾病(LCSC-821)中进行肺叶切除和节段切除术的随机试验,而48%的非专业人员则同意接受五种不同形式化学疗法的随机试验转移性疾病(SWOG-8241)中的比例为19%。结论是,非专业人士无法辨别本领域专家清楚的临床试验可接受性差异。随后,受访者被告知医生在相同情况下将做出的决定,并询问此信息是否会改变他们先前的决定。同意手术试验的患者比例没有净变化,但是同意化疗试验的患者比例下降了40%。大多数外行人士表示,他们希望在同意参加临床试验之前先获得此类信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号